“THE SYNTHESIS” 3-1-2012 GA PRE-PRIMARY EDITION: OBAMA NO LONGER RECOGNIZED AS PRESIDENT OR LEGALLY OCCUPYING THE OFFICE AS HIS 60-DAY NOTICE TO VACATE EXPIRED AFTER IMPEACHMENT ORDER 1/1/2012 ON 3/1/12, ROMNEY’S MICHIGAN DRAW WITH RICK SANTORUM REVEALS SERIOUS ISSUES OF CORRUPTION WITH BAIN, UNETHICAL LOBBYING, AND VOTE BRIBERY, AS BAIN BOYCOTT SPREADS, ELECTION 2012 AT FEVER PITCH, AND PART 1 BOOK REVIEWS FROM NOMINEES, WHAT’S WORTH READING AND WHAT’S NOT... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XKRDfkzfsUYwbSahZMeH7fwBrQCcJSeAduScEQDqLZE/edit?pli=1
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty
@SenatorReid FYI with Obama's Impeachment Order/60 day vacate notice effective at midnight, he is no longer anyone to be respected.
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @SenatorReid You will defer your concerns to interim Senator John Kerry and Senator John McCain, acting jointly as Presidential Office.
February 22
People are just now awake, like a book dropped on the floor, it was like slowly awakening the soul of our country for 3yrs., they have now had time to reflect, consider, and reread all that has happened through the archive too. I agree, this is a perilous time, when people have been lulled by the media and a puff of air could set the course of the future in any direction.
February 22
There was a report today that there has been a huge increase in people who are now receiving disability benefits....The increase is due to people claiming mental illness in many cases....They have fallen off of the unemployment statistics but are still receiving a check from the government.....People are desperate and are turning to the government for help.....and the current administration is more than happy to play with the numbers to make it look like the job situation is getting better.....
February 22
Thanks for that, I will insert that when I find the article as a followup to the Entitlement reform bill http://ga-teapartychief.blogspot.com/
ga-teapartychief.blogspot.com
February 22
I will try to forward that to your wall Aja.....Thank you!!
February 22
'preciate ya
February 22
Standing too many months on the unemployment line is driving Americans crazy — literally — and it’s costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars.
February 22
thank you !!! I will post the final copy to your page
February 22
OK , Mal Lunn was the person who posted this originally...Thank you Aja....
February 22
thanks again
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S CLAIMS AND ABC’S FLUFFY PRESS ON UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS ARE FOUND TO BE UNTRUE: PEOPLE ARE NOW DEFRAUDING SOCIAL SECURITY TO GET THEIR MONEY OUT NOW, AS THEY CAN NO LONGER APPLY FOR UNEMPLOYMENT EXTENSIONS IN THEIR STATES, STILL UNABLE TO FIND WORK !!!!
Jobless disability claims soar to record $200B as of January
By JANET WHITMANLast Updated: 10:41 AM, February 19, 2012
Posted: 10:47 PM, February 18, 2012
More
PrintStanding too many months on the unemployment line is driving Americans crazy — literally — and it’s costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars.
With their unemployment-insurance checks running out, some of the country’s long-term jobless are scrambling to fill the gap by filing claims for mental illness and other disabilities with Social Security — a surge that hobbles taxpayers and making the employment rate look healthier than it should as these people drop out of the job statistics.
“It could be because their health really is getting worse from the stress of being out of work,” says Matthew Rutledge, a research economist at Boston College. “Or it could just be desperation — people trying to make ends meet when other safety nets just aren’t there.”
As of January, the federal government was mailing out disability checks to more than 10.5 million individuals, including 2 million to spouses and children of disabled workers, at a cost of record $200 billion a year, recent research from JPMorgan Chase shows.
The sputtering economy has fueled those ranks. Around 5.3 percent of the population between the ages of 25 and 64 is currently collecting federal disability payments, a jump from 4.5 percent since the economy slid into a recession.
Mental-illness claims, in particular, are surging.
During the recent economic boom, only 33 percent of applicants were claiming mental illness, but that figure has jumped to 43 percent, says Rutledge, citing preliminary results from his latest research.
His research also shows a growing number of men, particularly older, former white-collar workers, instead of the typical blue-collar ones, are applying.
The big concern about the swelling ranks is that once people get on disability, they’re unlikely to give it up and go back to work.
“It’s not like other support programs, such as unemployment insurance, which you lose after a year or two,” says Michael Feroli, chief US economist with JPMorgan.
Social Security’s disability fund, which has been operating short of cash since 2005, is forecast to run out of reserves by 2018.
The jump in successful disability claims also is making the unemployment picture look extra rosy because those folks are falling off the jobless rolls.
“If they’re on disability they’re generally not counted,” says Feroli, who estimates that a quarter of those dropping out of the job market are getting disability. “It’s no trivial number.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/pain_brings_gain_taZkGOAUhXALmhEEyMpmqJ#ixzz1nvkpbx1S
The reason I like Rick Santorum is because everything about him is ANTI-OBAMA... I am not swayed by GOP or Bain's money on Romney whatsoever
Like · Mary Ann Plemons likes this.
Why are you? Please be blunt... — with Herman Trader and 21 others.
Unlike · · Share
Pat Johnson both his white and his dark halfs
George Brown Yeah.
Lee Summers Honest, not blunt...well ok a little blunt...
Lora Hurd Yes he is and we should all be yelling from our roof tops to stop him !!
Pat Johnson we should all be in DC on the steps of whitehut calling him out into the street
Pat Johnson Congress isn't going to do it
Paul Lafleur I am pro Obama cause he is the best we have had since Clinton
Patti Forcucci Yawn Ohhhhhh k. Paul, Do you feel you are incapable of being an independent thinker and making your own decisions? Do you want the "law" in your business monitoring everything you do and attacking you for the most ridiculous actions, such as eating sugar?
Aja Brooks that's right, it sure ain't because he's black, but the fact he's not a citizen and his intentions are not the best
Aja Brooks @Paul Lafleur you are ignorant: Clinton uses Obama like his pet monkey, and no this is terrible for our country and terrible to do someone like that so you can still act like you're President when you're not.... Obama never should've been President.
| “THE SYNTHESIS”, TWO YEARS IN PRINT, THE ONLY FREE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER POWERED BY TWITTER, FACEBOOK, AND TEA PARTY CONTRIBUTORS !!! ALSO HEREBY KNOWN AS “THE TEA PARTY RECORDER” -- ENJOY OUR TEA PARTY JOURNALS Tea Party Chief Speaker · Aug 2011 to present · Washington, District of Columbia front line communicator with Congress
to see my library collection (what I’ve read and studied the past 10yrs. add me on Facebook) http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150377708318670.370366.773523669&type=3
NOW:  http://www.youtube.com/user/The2011Phoenix |
B4IN Tea Party Ed. @B4INTeaParty· Open
Sheriff Joe Arpaio states Probable cause Obama birth certificate fraud, March 1, 2012 news conference, Arpaio criminal probe begins,...Retweeted by Tea Party Chief
How did this escape Judge Malihi?
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 2012
VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL (PART 2)
SHOCK AND ODD –Along with previous evidence proving the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” posted on the internet in April, 2011 was digitally fabricated, we reveal powerful new evidence which shows that data contained on the document contradicts Obama’s birth narrative and vital statistical accounting methods used at the alleged time of his birth. Vast disparities between the natal information appearing in the image and the standard methods used by federal and municipal governments to code, identify and report the contents of U.S. vital records prove that Obama’s alleged Hawaiian birth record was assembled to intentionally obscure the truth about his natal biography.
By Penbrook Johannson and Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN
NEW YORK, NY – An intensive examination of the contents of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” image by the most respected experts in vital records accounting and identity investigation reveals that much of the contrived information about his alleged Hawaiian birth simply renders his Natural-born status impossible.
In cooperation with former members of the Social Security Administration’s Records and Claims Investigation office, along with information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), this installment of our report reveals evidence, for the first time, which shows the content of Obama’s document image was hastily and recently manufactured by criminal counterfeiters secretly working in collaboration with both the White House and the municipal government of the State of Hawaii.
Most importantly, the actual data found in the document image reveals that Obama’s natal history is in direct, and even absurd, conflict with historical precedents defining citizenry, demographics and birth metrics as well as protocols governing vital statistics accounting while exposing epic deceptions on a scale never before seen in American political history.
Aside from the contextual contradictions revealed by Obama's alleged 1961 birth records, it can never be dismissed that, according to centuries of legal and doctrinal precedence, the fact that Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth forever disqualifies him from ever being eligible to hold the office of president unless the Constitution were to have been legally changed prior to his presidency.
A natural-born citizen is one born of geographic and biological circumstances, and to have remained under those citizenship metrics from birth to election, which make it impossible for any authority or public perception to consider him or her allied with any status other than naturally-born as a citizen of that nation.
Being born in a geographic location which is under the protection of the U.S. Constitution to two citizen parents are two of the three major components of natural-born citizenship according to historical authority defining the term. The third requirement of natural-born citizenship is continuity of that status without renouncement, voluntary or not, by expatriation, extradition or adoption to foreign parents.
These metrics were not made to hurt the feelings of those not qualified. They were intended to protect the sovereignty of the United States of America and its Constitutional rights through ensuring, to the highest possible degree, the allegiances of its executive powers. For, only the executive branch is led by one.
Failure to understand this is tantamount to willful ignorance and inferior understanding of the reason why America remains the greatest santuary of freedom and protection in world history.
INTRODUCTIONThe biggest misconception people have about birth certificates is that they always reveal the geographic location where the baby actually emerged from the mother's womb. This is not true. In most cases, the U.S. "Certificate of Live Birth" indicates the location and facility of "origination" of the certificate in conjunction with the first time a medical authority was able to verify birth metrics either through actually attending the birth, or by a first examination of the mother and child. Vital statistics reveal that 96% of birth certificates are originated in hospitals, but that a large number of those birth's did not actually occur in the hospital shown on the certificate.
The evolution of methods used to collect, prepare and report vital statistics must be carefully examined in order to understand how Obama exploited Hawaiian culture and its municipality to become America’s first ineligible president.
Vital statistics reporting methods fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Health, Center for Disease Control, Census Bureau and multiple branch agencies in public health monitoring. This federal cacophony of bureaucracy works in collaboration with the state health municipalities in each state and U.S. territories to manage the nations vital records and statistics standards.
Vital records are implemented without concern for defining the citizenship status of the subjects on the vital records. Regulations governing the collection and reporting of vital statistics are purposed for improving accuracy, timeliness and availability of vital statistics data to be used for public health services, disease prevention and population.
Most certainly, vital records and statistics were never intended to be used as evidence for determining the eligibility of individuals to hold public office. The information contained in them does not provide an accurate portrayal of the specific natal circumstances, biographical events and geographic indicators required for determining Natural-born citizenry. Vital records simply are not qualified for making such determinations, but in the absence of other vetting resources and effort by authorities, they serve as a starting point for investigation.
Since some have chosen to elicit validation from the absurdity of internet images of alleged 50-year-old birth records, without so much as questioning their authenticity or origins, to determine a previously obscure politician’s eligibility to hold the most powerful and dangerous position in the world, they get what they deserve in their failure to demand a higher vetting standard.
Not only has the American public descended to new depths of endemic irrationality over Obama’s alleged birth records, the complex world of vital records and statistics has been breached to reveal some of the most bizarre protocols and complex logistics of any municipal service.
Tragically, so many remain willing to accept an ambiguous, uncorroborated image of an alleged document posted to the most corruptible and unreliable source of mythology in history, the internet, as the holy grail of some politician’s legitimacy to hold the greatest executive and military power on earth.
OBAMA’S STATISTICAL CONTRADICTIONS
According to the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report, Vol.1: Natality (VSUS Report), Hawaii’s 1961 birth statistics were tabulated by the National Vital Statistics office from microfilm copies of the certificates provided by the State of Hawaii’s main Vital Records office in Honolulu.
The records were organized by the main Hawaiian Vital Records office in order of “regional” sequence according to the alphabetical order of the five counties and two metropolitan areas in which the birth record was originated, not where the birth occurred. They were then assembled into “blocks” of 20 records and microfilmed.
Upon delivery to the NCHS, the data was transcribed by personnel and then manually “punched” onto cards prior to their insertion into a card-reader where the data was stored on magnetic tape in a 150+ digit string of code numbers for each record, each digit specifying a distinctive piece of data on the certificate accounting for birth metrics, demographics, age, location, parentage, health statistics, etc.
In successive years, according to the U.S. Vital Statistics System guide, beginning in 1962, the NCHS evolved to electronic data allowing each state to place the records on magnetic tape themselves as the preferred media for delivery of birth data. Computer processing and software media began to be used in the early 1980s.
In 1961, the NCHS stored birth statistics in “blocks” of 20 records on magnetic tape based on a 50-percent sample of even-numbered certificates only. This fact raises doubts about the authenticity of Obama’s alleged certificate given its alleged odd number and yet it contains preliminary codes scribed in the margins of the item entry spaces.
Many have asked why, if only even numbered certificates were tabulated, are these marks are also present on the odd-numbered certificate of Susan Nordyke, one of twins, allegedly born on August 5th after Obama. This is because the statistics for plural births must be accounted exclusively.
Notice the "X-X" notation in the "Plural Birth" entry on the image of Obama's alleged certificate, as opposed to the "1-2" (one of two) and 2-2 (two of two) on the Nordyke image. This indicates the entry code for non-plural birth.
According to NCHS protocols, tabulations were always taken from all certificates of plural births (twins, triplets etc.) because not all plural births are same-sex or even numbers of births. Therefore, natal statistics must be accounted for each birth of a plural event for statistical accuracy. Otherwise all twins, triplets, etc., would be accounted by the NCHS as the same-sex and if only even-numbered certificate of triplets are accounted using the factor (times two), the result would inaccurately indicate four births or two births, not three. (Odd birth + Even Birth + Odd Birth = two births based on the even-number sample x 2 factor or, even + odd + even = four births based on even-number sample x 2 factor). Therefore plural births are tabulated separately using a 100% certificate sample.
Pencil marks indicate Obama's certificate was prepared for coding and statistical tabulation. Data found in the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” demonstrates the disparity between the documented evidence about his birth facts and the propaganda supporting his claim to natural-born citizenship as well as America’s first so-called "black" president.
According to the 1961 Vital Statistics Instruction Manual (VSIM) Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” reveals that he is actually not America’s first “black” president. In fact, by vital statistics reporting standards, he is not even bi-racial. This is significant not to the issue of his race, but to the accuracy of the information on the image in comparison to his widely accepted birth narrative, in general.
Demographic coding of the information as it is stated on the image causes him to be classified as “white”, not “black”, contrary to what media propaganda has tried to convince us. Vital statistics reporting protocols state that a child’s race is classified by the race of the parents with consideration given in the following priority.
1. If the race of both parents is coded the same, the child is that race, as well.
2. If one parent is classified as white (Code 1) and the other is classified as one of codes 0 or 2 through 8, then the child’s race is also classified as one of the classification codes found in 0 or 2 through 8.
3. The child’s race is classified by the father’s race unless the father’s race code is 9, which means “Not stated” or “not classifiable”, then the child’s race is classified by the mother’s race.
Race codes for reporting the mother’s and father’s race on the standard Certificate of Live Birth in 1961 were the same codes and were as follows:
According to vital statistics coding protocols in 1961 this code dictates the race of his father is “not stated” and, therefore, according to the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942 (MSVSA) and the VSIM issued by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Obama’s race must be classified by his mother’s race when the father’s race is reported as “not stated” or “not classifiable”. Therefore, since his mother’s race is classified as “1 ... White”, according to the reporting code found scribed next to her race on the image, Obama is “white” according to the NCHS.
Table above shows the term "African" coded after 1989, not number 9. Propaganda supporting Obama’s birth narrative pushes the lie that he is America’s first “black” president which would mean that either parents’ race would have to be coded as the number 2, not 9, with other parent being coded number 1. Otherwise, if both parents are not coded as 1 or 9, then the father dictates the race of the child.
For example, if the father is coded "1" and the mother is coded "2", then the race of the child is "2" because "2" is the non-white code of one parent. If the mother’s race is code "2" and the father’s race is code "5", then the race of the child is coded "5" because both parents are non-white but the father’s race dictates the child’s race when both parents are non-white. However, if the father’s race is "9", then the race of the child is the same as the mother’s.
This example is just one of the inconsistencies between the data found within Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” and his popular, but false, birth narrative conveyed by propagandists and media abettors.
THE LEFT MARGIN
Many have wondered why the left margin of the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” is curling away under a digital “clipping mask”. An obvious explanation used by Obama’s defenders is that it was copied from a book of bound certificates in the main office of the Hawaiian department of Health.
However, this explanation does not explain two very significant facts about the image which, when considering vital statistics reporting methodology, render the certificate image a fraudulent document unqualified to determine the eligibility of Barack Obama to be President.
First, the overlay of what appears to be security paper was used around the visible part of the document image to conceal the lower portion of the document which contains birth metrics, health information and coding guidelines about the specific circumstances of the birth and the child’s biography after birth. For example, the author of this story has an original birth certificate which contains notations in this portion of the document indicating a change in paternity five years after his birth.
More importantly, however, the left margin of the document is not visible because the forgers wanted to conceal the codes scribed in that area. A few of these numbers are visible. However, the ones that are only partially visible or concealed are the ones which reveal the codes reported about the location and circumstances of paternity of the birth.
The numbers 6, 2 and what looks to be the flourish of a 5 appear next to the entry boxes for parental information.
The possibility of the presence of a “5” in this location has foreboding implication with regard to Obama’s birth. According to the Vital Statistics Instruction manual, this code means “Other” with regard to “Type of Location of Birth” – Code Outline shown here:
The presence of the “6” next to the “Place of Birth” item is most troubling. As the second digit of the number 56, the 1961 VSIM uses the number 56 to code the location of births which occur outside of the United States but which are processed “in conjunction with” the county of registration. The states and the District of Columbia are numbered in alphabetical order from 01 to 51 while Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Panama Canal Zone were 52 through 55, respectively. This left the number 56 as the code for classifying “Remainder of the World”. This can be found in the 1961, 1962, 1968, 1977, 1993 and 1999 versions of the VSIM. In 1993, number 55 was the code for New York City because of its large birth volume it was classified as its own major birth rate statistical reporting area.
Essentially, this means the code tape file contains two spaces for the state to record a geographic code for the foreign location of the occurrence of the birth without showing that location on the certificate for a resident mother.
The presence of a “2” is probably the second digit of “12” which is the indication of the VSIM geographic code for Hawaii as the state of the Mother’s “Usual place of Residence”.
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION
According to the NCHS, the birth rate of residents of any statistical reporting area must be based on the total population of the residents of that area in order to be accurate. Therefore, according to the historical methods prescribed by the NCHS from 1945 to 1968 for attributing birth statistics to location, it is a requirement for State Vital Records and Statistics reporting offices to include births of residents in the birth rate no matter where the birth occurs. Logically, this is essential because the population and, therefore, municipal services are affected by those births when the mothers return to their residence with the child.
This circumstance is the impetus for Hawaii’s flexible birth registration process which allows residents of Hawaii, within a year of the birth, to register the birth in Hawaii up to one year after the birth. Theoretically, a pregnant woman who considered Hawaii her usual place of residence up until January 1st, 1960 could register a birth that occurs on December 31st, 1960 as late as December 30th, 1961, and she would not have had to live there for almost two years (See HRS 338-17) and the Certificate would not be marked “delayed” (See MSVSA, Reg. 3.1)
In the alleged year of Obama’s birth, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) published data in its 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report (VSUS Report) which shows that the state of Hawaii had the highest rate of Resident Birth Allocation by its state Department of Health than any state by more than 41 times the national average.
However, in the state of Hawaii in 1961, this rate was shockingly disparate with only a 0.40% birth rate to nonresident mothers while population outside of Honolulu increased by an annual rate of 96.4% in just ten years. This means that, in 1961, Hawaii registered births to mothers who were allocated residence in Hawaii on the birth certificate at a rate 41 times higher than the rest of the nation even though the population within the largest city, Honolulu, increased at the same rate as the rest of the nation (about 18.6% in 10 years).
However, in Hawaii, this was opposite in effect with regard to natal statistics reporting. Census data shows massive population growth outside of Hawaii’s metropolitan area which is shockingly incongruent with national birth rate statistics. This is because the Hawaiian Department of Health refused to distinguish between mothers of foreign, non-resident and resident births. Aggregately, Hawaii’s population rate also exceeded the national average, overall, based on the ratio of birth rates, immigration, and mortality rates.
Hawaii was the easiest place for a foreign mother to list Hawaii as her place of residence and have her birth allocated to that state than any other state. Likewise, Hawaii was the easiest place for a resident mother to give birth in a foreign country, return to Hawaii and have her birth registered as occurring in Hawaii. The two predominant reasons for this are a chronic misallocation of “usual place of residence” as the location of the birth and Hawaii’s isolated geography.
“Usual Place of Residence”
The “Usual Place of Residence” allocation for birth statistics was based on criteria described in both the 1960 Census Report published in October of 1961, and Section 5-11 of the 1961 VSUS Report, Volume 1: Natality. Census criteria describes “Usual Place of Residence” as “the place of residence where one lives and sleeps most of the time…”
Additionally, adopting the definition for birth statistics, the VSUS Report, section 5-11 states, “Errors in residence reporting result in a significant overstatement of births to residents near urban places…”
Therefore, cross referencing statistics of Hawaiian population growth between 1950 and 1960 with “birth-by-attendant in hospital” data in the VSUS Report indicated that significant errors in Hawaiian “birth by residence” reporting was the result of widespread overstatement of births to mothers who claimed Hawaii as their place of residence but did not actually give birth in a hospital in the state of Hawaii.
Recall, as of today, Obama has never provided a corresponding copy of his alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” directly from the alleged hospital of his birth. The absence of his birth documentation is supported by these statistical facts. Hawaii’s “birth by residents” data errors were the result of basing census population growth indicators from native birth registrations without natal statistics supported by hospital records and prenatal medical services. Babies were appearing everywhere in Hawaii according to native residence census data, but, unless everyone was having twins, no one could account for these births as occurring in Hawaii according to Natality data and American Hospital Association (AHA) statistics.
The only other state to show such disparate native birth statistics in relationship with normal native birth rate (non-immigration) population growth in the same period was Florida…as a result of mass exodus from Cuba. Like Hawaii, one year old “American” babies of “resident mothers” were showing up in doctors’ offices and state department of health offices in Florida, but no one could account for their hospital birth rates or location of occurrence.
Therefore, because of decades of “open door” immigration policy in Hawaii prior to statehood, unless special care was taken in asking for residence information on birth certificate applications, mothers were simply identified as being Hawaiian residents outside of the central city when they registered the births within a year of their occurrence. The idea that such misrepresentation could affect political eligibility or citizenship status under the weight of Hawaii’s municipal development challenges simply was not considered by state and local governments.
In 1960, this situation assumed special importance with the completion of Honolulu International Airport renovations and international aviation service expansion. The increased use of air travel made utilization of American hospitals in cities by non-resident aliens easier creating a massive transaction of people via Hawaii and Asia between 1945 and 1965. Likewise, it made departure from, and return to, Hawaii for residents more efficient as well. This trend saw a pronounced increase in the years 1959-1961 when commercial aviation development reached its peak in Hawaii.
Frustrated and overwhelmed, the Hawaiian Vital Records office, under Title 11, Chapter 8 of its Public Health Regulations, following a radical interpretation of NCHS birth statistics reporting protocol, implemented a remedy for this disparate anomaly after the 1960 Census. In what can only be considered one of the most bizarre examples of twisted municipal logic, rather than record foreign births, the Hawaiian government simply decided the local office where the record was submitted was the location of the occurrence of the vital event, no questions asked (or, at least very few).
Essentially, this means that births could occur anywhere else in the world and the parents could apply for a birth certificate knowing the state vital records and immigration authority would not investigate the circumstances of the birth. This was the case with more than 6000 reported cases of immigrants from the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan, China and Siam from 1946 to 1959, as well as the oft noted case of Chinese born Sun Yet Sen, leader of the democratic movement in China, who was born there but possessed an original birth certificate from the state of Hawaii stating he was born in that state.
Shockingly, statistical comparisons of birth data between 1950 and 1960 reveals that Hawaii’s birth registration volume was higher than the calculable volume of births based on the ratio of non-immigration population increase to birth rate. This is because Hawaii registered births as occurring in Hawaii which do not actually occur in Hawaii and then reported them as native birth statistics to the federal government in order to inflate its statistics triggering federal funding for public services.
The foul reality is that any member of Barack Obama’s family could exercise specific legal and administrative procedures clearly outlined in statutory language and acquire an official, original, standard “Certificate of Live Birth” which, by evidentiary provision after the fact, can legally state he was born in Hawaii, without him actually being born there. The only three things needed for this to occur for Obama is that a lie be told, an affiant confirm the lie, and the Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health rubber stamp it.
Though legal in Hawaii, such misrepresentation disqualifies presidential candidates because it does not endow Natural-born citizenship as defined by the legal foundations of the U.S. Constitution.
Isolation
Enemies seeking to confiscate the power and resources of any nation will attempt to infiltrate its citizenry and government structure through the most unmonitored, isolated and easily bypassed points of entry. In 1960, that point of entry in the U.S. was Hawaii.
The Hawaiian islands sit in the middle of the Pacific Ocean at an equal distance from 18 different countries, all having direct flight access to more than 15 airports on eight different islands all of which are within 190 miles of Honolulu. No place in the world in 1961 was more traveled by people from more destinations that the Hawaiian archipelago.
Research also reveals that no state in American history has enacted more customized laws to facilitate an open birth documentation process than Hawaii. The perplexity of the Aloha state’s vital records administrative processes are the result of that states struggle to account for native indigenous Hawaiian heritage, U.S. citizen non-residents and foreign immigrants.
Essentially, Hawaii’s vital records laws are intended to integrate indigenous and migratory populations with American economics and modalities while, at the same time, maintain cultural exclusivity through oscillating statutory revision. Hawaii’s vital records management system has never been exempt from this ever adjusting accommodation.
These enigmatic warrants originate long before Hawaii’s statehood in August, 1959. For more than 110 years, indigenous populations, geographic isolation, unmonitored migration, international tourism, transportation modalities, municipal underdevelopment and multicultural inclusivity make Hawaii the single most unaccountable native birth allocation destination in American history.
OBAMA’S VERY “ODD” CERTIFICATE
One misconception about Obama’s natal records is that the alleged date and time of his birth are responsible for the allocation of the certificate number shown on the upper right corner of the images posted in 2008 and April, 2011. The image of Obama’s 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” shows it was allegedly stamped by the main office of the Hawaiian Health Department with the number 151-61-10641.
There are three successive sets of circumstances which impact the assignment of a record number found on vital records, the least of which is the date and time of the occurrence of the birth.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics and the Model State Vital Statistics Act, Section 1, in order for birth records to be official they must:
1. Establish a date, time and location of the birth based on medical or administrative authority (administrative declaration must be used if occurrence was in the absence of medical verification);
2. They must be submitted to a local (county) registrar jurisdiction in an appropriate location as defined by state public health regulations prior to legal deadlines governing birth registrations and;
3. Upon receipt by the main office of the state Health Department’s Vital Records Registrar, they must be stamped with an official record number and affixed with a state registrar seal.
In the case of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” the progression of these circumstances combined with Hawaii’s extremely liberal public health regulations reveal shocking misrepresentations.
Date, Time and Location of Birth
According to the MSVSA (Rev. 1959), the network of local (county) registrar offices in the seven jurisdictions of the state of Hawaii were not under the official authority of the main office of the State Health Department’s Registrar (until 1977) as much as they worked collaboratively within best practices to implement an effective vital records system among a geographically challenged and culturally complex population.
Births were recorded under two circumstances. Upon the attendant’s filing of a birth certificate within seven days of the occurrence of birth or the filing of a certificate upon examination of the child for the first time by a Hawaiian medical professional with competent jurisdiction to determine if the birth had occurred within one year of the examination. Both circumstances allow for the filing of the same standard “Certificate of Live Birth” based on the certification of a medical authority without special indications as to the date of registration or actual location of the birth.
Therefore, many assume Obama’s record number would have been stamped to the document in August of 1961 because that is the date of birth shown on the document. However, according to Hawaii Public Health Regulations Title 11, in coordination with the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942 (Rev. 1959), this is not true.
For the past several years, many have wondered why Obama’s alleged record number is higher than those of twin sisters, Gretchen and Susan Nordyke, since the widely accepted account of his birth is that it occurred in the same hospital 19 hours before the twins. The Nordykes’ certificates were assigned the lower numbers of 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638.
After months of ambiguity by Obama, conflicting hearsay and wrangling by world-wide media sources over the actual place of birth, leading up to the 2008 election, it was finally decided by Wikipedia (Wiki article: “Barack Obama”, August 2008) that Obama’s birth must have occurred in the Hawaiian hospital at 7:24 p.m., August 4th based on uncorroborated documentation from unanimous, unaccountable sources. Interestingly, ensuing discussion was no longer permitted about the subject on the site’s “talk” page. Therefore, simply taken, if record numbers were thought to be assigned chronologically in order with the date and time of occurrence of the three births, sequence dictates that Obama’s number should be much lower.
Theoretically, based on data provided by the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report, Vol. 1: Natality, which indicates an average of approximately 48 birth registrations per day (one every 30 minutes) throughout Hawaii, this would mean that there were approximately 38 other births registered between Obama’s and the twins, based just on date and time of birth, alone.
However, an accounting of newspaper announcements for all births appearing on August 4th and 5th reveal there were as many as 46 between 7:24 p.m., August 4th and 2:00 p.m., August 5th. By these statistical disparities, one might expect Obama’s actual birth registration number to be around 10591 (subtract 46 from 10637) based on the alleged date and time of his birth.
However, record numbers were not assigned by date and time of birth in Hawaii in 1961 as indicated by Hawaii Administrative Rule 117 of the Hawaii Public Health Regulations.
Date and Time of Submission
Upon an extensive examination of 1961 Hawaiian birth announcements in comparison with vital records archives, it was discovered that announcements were published based on the order of submission to each local office within each region of Hawaii, not the date of the occurrence of the birth (see Vital Statistics Instruction Manual, Section C, p. 55 and Model State Vital Statistics Act Section 6(c)). However, birth record numbers were not assigned by this local submission sequence, either.
Hawaiian Public Health Regulations for Vital Records Processing (HAR 117, Section 2) dictated, then and now, that when a vital event occurred with an attendant, the vital record must be submitted within seven days to the local vital records receiving office (this became five days in 1977) of their occurrence and duplicates maintained within the local jurisdiction of their origination (See Section 2 and Section 8 of HAR Title 11.117.8).
In Hawaii, there are several variables which affected the definition of “origination” of a vital record in 1961. Origination was not always defined as the location of the vital event but rather wherever the birthed subject was first examined by a medical professional of authority as defined by the Health Department.
The most significant development, and one that opens Obama’s eligibility to intense scrutiny, is that the NCHS made the distinction, for 1961 statistics, (after Census data and the addition of an additional entry box for the revision to the standard certificate in 1956) between a mother’s location of usual residence and the actual location of the occurrence of the vital event, regardless of where she was when the event occurred.
This distinction was made because, as transportation modalities improved and hospitals developed better natal care facilities, previous birth records did not account for a sudden accelerated increase in birth rates shown in the same counties as the hospitals. These modern developments skewed data making it appear as though virtually all the births in a state were by mothers who lived in the same county as the location of the hospital. They didn’t, they just traveled there from another county to give birth.
This is particularly significant in Hawaii in 1961 since Hawaiian counties and their populations are separated by ocean. The statistical distinction was eventually morphed and contorted as part of the justification for passing latter sections of Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 governing the issuance of original Hawaiian birth certificates to foreign-born children as late as up to one year after the birth (See also Model State Vital Statistics Act, Regulation 3.1), further confirming reasons that birth records from Hawaii should never be relied upon for determining the eligibility of a President without extensive investigation of the circumstances of their origins.
We now know that Hawaii’s derelict laws pose a serious threat to national security with regard to its permissiveness of false natal citizenship status for aspiring presidential candidates.
Additionally, a mapping of birth announcement addresses with respect to their order of newspaper publication reveals their sequence was established by the order of their submission from the State of Hawaii Department of Health main office to the newspaper, which, prior to this, was established by the order of their submission from the regional offices to the main office. This multistep process shows that record numbers were not assigned in chronological order of registration, nor were they assigned based on the date and time of the birth. They were assigned first, by region code, which is based on an alphabetical order of counties (See VSIM, Sec. C, p. 55), of registration and, secondly, with time needed to process, by date of receipt and verification by the State Registrar in the main Health Department office in Honolulu. A number was not assigned until the information was attested and verified by a medical authority at some point after the birth, regardless if the birth was attended by the signing physician (see MSVSA, Section 7 and Reg. 3.1).
Recall, as stated in the Vital Statistics Instruction Manual, Section C, “Coding and Punching” and the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report, Table 3-1, the “regional” ordering and numbering of vital records was necessary to prevent inaccurate accounting of rural, foreign, non-hospital and unattended births, which did not occur with the same frequency as more numerous urban, hospital and physician-attended births. The increase in statistical probability for inaccurate accounting was due to the federally mandated 50-percent reporting method using even-numbered certificates only.
In Part 1 of our report, we showed that the main office of Hawaii’s Health Department processed birth registrations from seven such regions in 1961. They were:
Hawaii County which was divided into:
1. The incorporated area of Hilo and,
2. The remainder of the island of Hawaii (which is the remainder of the county);
Honolulu County which was divided into:
3. The incorporated area (standard metropolitan statistical area) of Honolulu and;
4. The remainder of the Island of Oahu and;
The three remaining counties including:
5. Kalawao County on the island of Molaki;
6. Kauai County which includes the Island of Nihau and;
7. Maui County which includes the islands of Maui, Lanai and Molokai (except for the peninsula settlement region of Kalawao County).
Therefore, along with eliminating time and place of birth, record numbers were also not assigned based on date of submission to local offices.
September Surprise: Receipt of Obama’s Records by the State Office
The record number is the very last piece of data to officially be placed on a birth certificate. Only after all signatures, information, birth data, stamps have been finalized is the record indexed by the State Registrar’s office.
There were 1472 births registered in Hawaii in August, 1961 which averages to about 48 per day. However, because births outside of Honolulu County were collected by the main registrar’s office on a less frequent basis, Honolulu County births were not only assigned a higher proportion of registration numbers in the reporting period, they were assigned more numbers earlier in the reporting year. About 3% more, or, statistically, about 528 record numbers, over the 1961 reporting year.
This disparity should raise suspicions on its merit as to the number of birth registrations compared to the expectable birth rates among any population.
If birth certificate numbers were assigned based on submission order, not birth occurrence, one would expect Obama’s birth certificate number to be even more disparate from the Nordykes because his birth was allegedly submitted three days before the Nordykes’ on Tuesday, August 8th. The Nordykes’ records were not submitted to the local office in Honolulu until August 11th and were not stamped until at least the 14th, the first Monday after submission.
Chronologically speaking, based on birth rates in August of 1961, if numbers were assigned based on submission dates, this means that Obama’s certificate number should be as low as 10492.
Deadlines for transmittal of completed birth submissions from local offices to the main Department of Health Office varied depending on the location of the local office. The general rule for transmitting vital records in Hawaii in 1961 is outlined in Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11 Rule 117, Chapter 8, Section 8 of the Hawaii Public Health Regulations for Vital Statistics Registration and Records. The rule states: "Local registrars shall transmit certificates filed with them weekly to the State Health Department, except that on the outlying areas all certificates on hand the 4th of the month following the month of occurrence shall be mailed immediately by airmail."
The rule does not define “outlying”, nor does it prescribe measures for transmittal when airmail service was not available (which happened four times in 1960-61 due to tropical storms, see History of Hawaiian Aviation, State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation 1925-Present). Also, the 4th of each month occurred on a weekend four times in 1961 in February, March, July and November which means transmittal was delayed at least two more days, or about 400 births, statistically speaking.
This means that a birth registration which was submitted in Lihue, Kauai on December 1st, 1960 could be stored for 35 days before being sent to Honolulu via airmail on January 4th, 1961 where it would be received the next available business day, reviewed and finally be stamped with a number and state seal sometime before July 31st, the mandated federal deadline for reporting of birth statistics to the National Vital Statistics Office. This monthly “stacking” of outlying birth registrations created fluctuations in record number sequencing.
Most disturbingly, however, a birth without a previously established date and time , one that occurs abroad a year before, could be submitted the day of the final filing period for the preceding month, on the 4th day of the next month, if needed, before being delivered to the main state registrar's office for processing. Perhaps even August 4th. If the record required further verification or other input from the parents or medical examination, it could have been delayed even longer before finally assigned a record number.
Further clarification of the rule through HAR 91 indicates that local clerks’ offices and courts in Oahu are required to transmit vital records to the main Health Department office in Honolulu by hand delivery each week while offices not on the island of Oahu were requested by the main office to transmit uncertified, unstamped vital records, via airmail, but when information on the record was incomplete or unverified, a voucher was sent to the local office asking for clarification which would delay the record another week or two. Meanwhile, the record is held without a record number for all this time while other birth records are being stamped and filed.
Hawaii’s interisland airmail service from outlying islands to Honolulu was conducted from the following airports:
• Lihue Airport, Kauai County (91 miles to Honolulu)
• Kahului Airport, Island of Maui, Maui County (89 miles to Honolulu)
• Lanai Airport, Island of Lanai, Maui County (63 miles to Honolulu)
• Kalaupapa Airport, Island of Molokai, Kalawao County (54 miles to Honolulu)
• Hilo International Airport, Hawaii County (incorporated) (189 miles to Honolulu)
• Keahole International Airport or Waimea-Kohala Airport, Hawaii County (unincorporated) (151 miles to Honolulu).
In Hawaii, in 1961, birth registrations occurring outside of Honolulu County (off the Island of Oahu) were collected on a less frequent basis than births in Honolulu County, but the totals were divided into monthly statistics based on registration dates, for federal report data. Since the main health department office was in the city of Honolulu, on the island of Oahu, and more than 85% of the births in Hawaii occurred on Oahu, which is Honolulu County, it was beneficial for the registrar to account these births on a more frequent basis due to their higher volume. Birth registrations occurring inside of Honolulu County were accounted in the State of Hawaii’s main Department of Health Office each week. This is confirmed by the accounting of birth announcements in the newspapers with registrant addresses located in Honolulu County compared to those announcements for births whose registrant addresses are outside of Honolulu County.
This is a significant discovery given the disparate record number appearing on Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth”. The fact that his birth registration number is out of sequence with other births is an indication of anomalous circumstances involved in its assignment.
Additional to Hawaii’s geographic challenges, the state Health Department’s contract agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) stated that birth statistics were to be reported before July 31st of the following year in order to be included in publication for the previous year’s statistics report.
The 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. report shows there were 826 male child births in Hawaii in the month of August, 1961. A cross reference of addresses found in birth announcements published in the Hawaiian newspapers in August of 1961 with archives of residential listings shows that, out of all 826 births, only Barack Obama’s birth was registered to an address where the stated father did not live. According to reporting protocols this fact forces the Department of Health to allocate the usual residence of the mother as the location of the birth, no matter where the birth actually occurs. This was done to protect the custody rights of the mother and welfare of the child in cases when custody was challenged by a father residing in a foreign country. The child was declared a U.S. citizen by default of the mother’s usual place of residence and thereby protected under the U.S. Constitution.
This registration number is also out of sequence with other registered births in the same region Obama is alleged to have been born. This indicates that Obama’s registration number was assigned based on the occurrence of the birth registration in another location, and it was assigned up to a year after the actual occurrence of the birth using a number made available after the official reporting period, perhaps by a previous fetal death which authorities simply chose to classify as a non-Live birth event after the fact.
The registration number has no association with chronological ordering of birth occurrences. In 1961, the first three digits of a birth registration number represents the NCHS code for each Standard Metropolitan Statistics Reporting Area (151 for Honolulu), the following two digits were the year of the registration and, final five were the yearly accounting of birth registrations based the next available number for that region and registration period. This five digit number was expanded to six digits in later reporting periods to account for increase in yearly birth volumes.
Since Hawaii allowed birth registrations up to one year after the occurrence of the birth, it was impossible to keep sequential record numbers based on the time of each live birth event. For example, a birth which occurs in August of 1960 can be registered with Hawaii’s Health Department in August of 1961, but this birth would be given a 1961 registration number, not a 1960 number if the birth date was not established. 1960 registration numbers would be reported by July 31st of 1961.
WHAT THE EXPERTS SAY
Additionally, adopting the definition for birth statistics, the VSUS Report, section 5-11 states, “Errors in residence reporting result in a significant overstatement of births to residents near urban places…”
Therefore, cross referencing statistics of Hawaiian population growth between 1950 and 1960 with “birth-by-attendant in hospital” data in the VSUS Report indicated that significant errors in Hawaiian “birth by residence” reporting was the result of widespread overstatement of births to mothers who claimed Hawaii as their place of residence but did not actually give birth in a hospital in the state of Hawaii.
Recall, as of today, Obama has never provided a corresponding copy of his alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” directly from the alleged hospital of his birth. The absence of his birth documentation is supported by these statistical facts. Hawaii’s “birth by residents” data errors were the result of basing census population growth indicators from native birth registrations without natal statistics supported by hospital records and prenatal medical services. Babies were appearing everywhere in Hawaii according to native residence census data, but, unless everyone was having twins, no one could account for these births as occurring in Hawaii according to Natality data and American Hospital Association (AHA) statistics.
The only other state to show such disparate native birth statistics in relationship with normal native birth rate (non-immigration) population growth in the same period was Florida…as a result of mass exodus from Cuba. Like Hawaii, one year old “American” babies of “resident mothers” were showing up in doctors’ offices and state department of health offices in Florida, but no one could account for their hospital birth rates or location of occurrence.
Therefore, because of decades of “open door” immigration policy in Hawaii prior to statehood, unless special care was taken in asking for residence information on birth certificate applications, mothers were simply identified as being Hawaiian residents outside of the central city when they registered the births within a year of their occurrence. The idea that such misrepresentation could affect political eligibility or citizenship status under the weight of Hawaii’s municipal development challenges simply was not considered by state and local governments.
In 1960, this situation assumed special importance with the completion of Honolulu International Airport renovations and international aviation service expansion. The increased use of air travel made utilization of American hospitals in cities by non-resident aliens easier creating a massive transaction of people via Hawaii and Asia between 1945 and 1965. Likewise, it made departure from, and return to, Hawaii for residents more efficient as well. This trend saw a pronounced increase in the years 1959-1961 when commercial aviation development reached its peak in Hawaii.
Frustrated and overwhelmed, the Hawaiian Vital Records office, under Title 11, Chapter 8 of its Public Health Regulations, following a radical interpretation of NCHS birth statistics reporting protocol, implemented a remedy for this disparate anomaly after the 1960 Census. In what can only be considered one of the most bizarre examples of twisted municipal logic, rather than record foreign births, the Hawaiian government simply decided the local office where the record was submitted was the location of the occurrence of the vital event, no questions asked (or, at least very few).
Essentially, this means that births could occur anywhere else in the world and the parents could apply for a birth certificate knowing the state vital records and immigration authority would not investigate the circumstances of the birth. This was the case with more than 6000 reported cases of immigrants from the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan, China and Siam from 1946 to 1959, as well as the oft noted case of Chinese born Sun Yet Sen, leader of the democratic movement in China, who was born there but possessed an original birth certificate from the state of Hawaii stating he was born in that state.
Shockingly, statistical comparisons of birth data between 1950 and 1960 reveals that Hawaii’s birth registration volume was higher than the calculable volume of births based on the ratio of non-immigration population increase to birth rate. This is because Hawaii registered births as occurring in Hawaii which do not actually occur in Hawaii and then reported them as native birth statistics to the federal government in order to inflate its statistics triggering federal funding for public services.
The foul reality is that any member of Barack Obama’s family could exercise specific legal and administrative procedures clearly outlined in statutory language and acquire an official, original, standard “Certificate of Live Birth” which, by evidentiary provision after the fact, can legally state he was born in Hawaii, without him actually being born there. The only three things needed for this to occur for Obama is that a lie be told, an affiant confirm the lie, and the Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health rubber stamp it.
Though legal in Hawaii, such misrepresentation disqualifies presidential candidates because it does not endow Natural-born citizenship as defined by the legal foundations of the U.S. Constitution.
Isolation
Enemies seeking to confiscate the power and resources of any nation will attempt to infiltrate its citizenry and government structure through the most unmonitored, isolated and easily bypassed points of entry. In 1960, that point of entry in the U.S. was Hawaii.
The Hawaiian islands sit in the middle of the Pacific Ocean at an equal distance from 18 different countries, all having direct flight access to more than 15 airports on eight different islands all of which are within 190 miles of Honolulu. No place in the world in 1961 was more traveled by people from more destinations that the Hawaiian archipelago.
Research also reveals that no state in American history has enacted more customized laws to facilitate an open birth documentation process than Hawaii. The perplexity of the Aloha state’s vital records administrative processes are the result of that states struggle to account for native indigenous Hawaiian heritage, U.S. citizen non-residents and foreign immigrants.
Essentially, Hawaii’s vital records laws are intended to integrate indigenous and migratory populations with American economics and modalities while, at the same time, maintain cultural exclusivity through oscillating statutory revision. Hawaii’s vital records management system has never been exempt from this ever adjusting accommodation.
These enigmatic warrants originate long before Hawaii’s statehood in August, 1959. For more than 110 years, indigenous populations, geographic isolation, unmonitored migration, international tourism, transportation modalities, municipal underdevelopment and multicultural inclusivity make Hawaii the single most unaccountable native birth allocation destination in American history.
OBAMA’S VERY “ODD” CERTIFICATE
One misconception about Obama’s natal records is that the alleged date and time of his birth are responsible for the allocation of the certificate number shown on the upper right corner of the images posted in 2008 and April, 2011. The image of Obama’s 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” shows it was allegedly stamped by the main office of the Hawaiian Health Department with the number 151-61-10641.
There are three successive sets of circumstances which impact the assignment of a record number found on vital records, the least of which is the date and time of the occurrence of the birth.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics and the Model State Vital Statistics Act, Section 1, in order for birth records to be official they must:
1. Establish a date, time and location of the birth based on medical or administrative authority (administrative declaration must be used if occurrence was in the absence of medical verification);
2. They must be submitted to a local (county) registrar jurisdiction in an appropriate location as defined by state public health regulations prior to legal deadlines governing birth registrations and;
3. Upon receipt by the main office of the state Health Department’s Vital Records Registrar, they must be stamped with an official record number and affixed with a state registrar seal.
In the case of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” the progression of these circumstances combined with Hawaii’s extremely liberal public health regulations reveal shocking misrepresentations.
Date, Time and Location of Birth
According to the MSVSA (Rev. 1959), the network of local (county) registrar offices in the seven jurisdictions of the state of Hawaii were not under the official authority of the main office of the State Health Department’s Registrar (until 1977) as much as they worked collaboratively within best practices to implement an effective vital records system among a geographically challenged and culturally complex population.
Births were recorded under two circumstances. Upon the attendant’s filing of a birth certificate within seven days of the occurrence of birth or the filing of a certificate upon examination of the child for the first time by a Hawaiian medical professional with competent jurisdiction to determine if the birth had occurred within one year of the examination. Both circumstances allow for the filing of the same standard “Certificate of Live Birth” based on the certification of a medical authority without special indications as to the date of registration or actual location of the birth.
Therefore, many assume Obama’s record number would have been stamped to the document in August of 1961 because that is the date of birth shown on the document. However, according to Hawaii Public Health Regulations Title 11, in coordination with the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942 (Rev. 1959), this is not true.
For the past several years, many have wondered why Obama’s alleged record number is higher than those of twin sisters, Gretchen and Susan Nordyke, since the widely accepted account of his birth is that it occurred in the same hospital 19 hours before the twins. The Nordykes’ certificates were assigned the lower numbers of 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638.
After months of ambiguity by Obama, conflicting hearsay and wrangling by world-wide media sources over the actual place of birth, leading up to the 2008 election, it was finally decided by Wikipedia (Wiki article: “Barack Obama”, August 2008) that Obama’s birth must have occurred in the Hawaiian hospital at 7:24 p.m., August 4th based on uncorroborated documentation from unanimous, unaccountable sources. Interestingly, ensuing discussion was no longer permitted about the subject on the site’s “talk” page. Therefore, simply taken, if record numbers were thought to be assigned chronologically in order with the date and time of occurrence of the three births, sequence dictates that Obama’s number should be much lower.
Theoretically, based on data provided by the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report, Vol. 1: Natality, which indicates an average of approximately 48 birth registrations per day (one every 30 minutes) throughout Hawaii, this would mean that there were approximately 38 other births registered between Obama’s and the twins, based just on date and time of birth, alone.
However, an accounting of newspaper announcements for all births appearing on August 4th and 5th reveal there were as many as 46 between 7:24 p.m., August 4th and 2:00 p.m., August 5th. By these statistical disparities, one might expect Obama’s actual birth registration number to be around 10591 (subtract 46 from 10637) based on the alleged date and time of his birth.
However, record numbers were not assigned by date and time of birth in Hawaii in 1961 as indicated by Hawaii Administrative Rule 117 of the Hawaii Public Health Regulations.
Date and Time of Submission
Upon an extensive examination of 1961 Hawaiian birth announcements in comparison with vital records archives, it was discovered that announcements were published based on the order of submission to each local office within each region of Hawaii, not the date of the occurrence of the birth (see Vital Statistics Instruction Manual, Section C, p. 55 and Model State Vital Statistics Act Section 6(c)). However, birth record numbers were not assigned by this local submission sequence, either.
Hawaiian Public Health Regulations for Vital Records Processing (HAR 117, Section 2) dictated, then and now, that when a vital event occurred with an attendant, the vital record must be submitted within seven days to the local vital records receiving office (this became five days in 1977) of their occurrence and duplicates maintained within the local jurisdiction of their origination (See Section 2 and Section 8 of HAR Title 11.117.8).
In Hawaii, there are several variables which affected the definition of “origination” of a vital record in 1961. Origination was not always defined as the location of the vital event but rather wherever the birthed subject was first examined by a medical professional of authority as defined by the Health Department.
The most significant development, and one that opens Obama’s eligibility to intense scrutiny, is that the NCHS made the distinction, for 1961 statistics, (after Census data and the addition of an additional entry box for the revision to the standard certificate in 1956) between a mother’s location of usual residence and the actual location of the occurrence of the vital event, regardless of where she was when the event occurred.
This distinction was made because, as transportation modalities improved and hospitals developed better natal care facilities, previous birth records did not account for a sudden accelerated increase in birth rates shown in the same counties as the hospitals. These modern developments skewed data making it appear as though virtually all the births in a state were by mothers who lived in the same county as the location of the hospital. They didn’t, they just traveled there from another county to give birth.
This is particularly significant in Hawaii in 1961 since Hawaiian counties and their populations are separated by ocean. The statistical distinction was eventually morphed and contorted as part of the justification for passing latter sections of Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 governing the issuance of original Hawaiian birth certificates to foreign-born children as late as up to one year after the birth (See also Model State Vital Statistics Act, Regulation 3.1), further confirming reasons that birth records from Hawaii should never be relied upon for determining the eligibility of a President without extensive investigation of the circumstances of their origins.
We now know that Hawaii’s derelict laws pose a serious threat to national security with regard to its permissiveness of false natal citizenship status for aspiring presidential candidates.
Additionally, a mapping of birth announcement addresses with respect to their order of newspaper publication reveals their sequence was established by the order of their submission from the State of Hawaii Department of Health main office to the newspaper, which, prior to this, was established by the order of their submission from the regional offices to the main office. This multistep process shows that record numbers were not assigned in chronological order of registration, nor were they assigned based on the date and time of the birth. They were assigned first, by region code, which is based on an alphabetical order of counties (See VSIM, Sec. C, p. 55), of registration and, secondly, with time needed to process, by date of receipt and verification by the State Registrar in the main Health Department office in Honolulu. A number was not assigned until the information was attested and verified by a medical authority at some point after the birth, regardless if the birth was attended by the signing physician (see MSVSA, Section 7 and Reg. 3.1).
Recall, as stated in the Vital Statistics Instruction Manual, Section C, “Coding and Punching” and the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report, Table 3-1, the “regional” ordering and numbering of vital records was necessary to prevent inaccurate accounting of rural, foreign, non-hospital and unattended births, which did not occur with the same frequency as more numerous urban, hospital and physician-attended births. The increase in statistical probability for inaccurate accounting was due to the federally mandated 50-percent reporting method using even-numbered certificates only.
In Part 1 of our report, we showed that the main office of Hawaii’s Health Department processed birth registrations from seven such regions in 1961. They were:
Hawaii County which was divided into:
1. The incorporated area of Hilo and,
2. The remainder of the island of Hawaii (which is the remainder of the county);
Honolulu County which was divided into:
3. The incorporated area (standard metropolitan statistical area) of Honolulu and;
4. The remainder of the Island of Oahu and;
The three remaining counties including:
5. Kalawao County on the island of Molaki;
6. Kauai County which includes the Island of Nihau and;
7. Maui County which includes the islands of Maui, Lanai and Molokai (except for the peninsula settlement region of Kalawao County).
Therefore, along with eliminating time and place of birth, record numbers were also not assigned based on date of submission to local offices.
September Surprise: Receipt of Obama’s Records by the State Office
The record number is the very last piece of data to officially be placed on a birth certificate. Only after all signatures, information, birth data, stamps have been finalized is the record indexed by the State Registrar’s office.
There were 1472 births registered in Hawaii in August, 1961 which averages to about 48 per day. However, because births outside of Honolulu County were collected by the main registrar’s office on a less frequent basis, Honolulu County births were not only assigned a higher proportion of registration numbers in the reporting period, they were assigned more numbers earlier in the reporting year. About 3% more, or, statistically, about 528 record numbers, over the 1961 reporting year.
This disparity should raise suspicions on its merit as to the number of birth registrations compared to the expectable birth rates among any population.
If birth certificate numbers were assigned based on submission order, not birth occurrence, one would expect Obama’s birth certificate number to be even more disparate from the Nordykes because his birth was allegedly submitted three days before the Nordykes’ on Tuesday, August 8th. The Nordykes’ records were not submitted to the local office in Honolulu until August 11th and were not stamped until at least the 14th, the first Monday after submission.
Chronologically speaking, based on birth rates in August of 1961, if numbers were assigned based on submission dates, this means that Obama’s certificate number should be as low as 10492.
Deadlines for transmittal of completed birth submissions from local offices to the main Department of Health Office varied depending on the location of the local office. The general rule for transmitting vital records in Hawaii in 1961 is outlined in Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11 Rule 117, Chapter 8, Section 8 of the Hawaii Public Health Regulations for Vital Statistics Registration and Records. The rule states: "Local registrars shall transmit certificates filed with them weekly to the State Health Department, except that on the outlying areas all certificates on hand the 4th of the month following the month of occurrence shall be mailed immediately by airmail."
The rule does not define “outlying”, nor does it prescribe measures for transmittal when airmail service was not available (which happened four times in 1960-61 due to tropical storms, see History of Hawaiian Aviation, State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation 1925-Present). Also, the 4th of each month occurred on a weekend four times in 1961 in February, March, July and November which means transmittal was delayed at least two more days, or about 400 births, statistically speaking.
This means that a birth registration which was submitted in Lihue, Kauai on December 1st, 1960 could be stored for 35 days before being sent to Honolulu via airmail on January 4th, 1961 where it would be received the next available business day, reviewed and finally be stamped with a number and state seal sometime before July 31st, the mandated federal deadline for reporting of birth statistics to the National Vital Statistics Office. This monthly “stacking” of outlying birth registrations created fluctuations in record number sequencing.
Most disturbingly, however, a birth without a previously established date and time , one that occurs abroad a year before, could be submitted the day of the final filing period for the preceding month, on the 4th day of the next month, if needed, before being delivered to the main state registrar's office for processing. Perhaps even August 4th. If the record required further verification or other input from the parents or medical examination, it could have been delayed even longer before finally assigned a record number.
Further clarification of the rule through HAR 91 indicates that local clerks’ offices and courts in Oahu are required to transmit vital records to the main Health Department office in Honolulu by hand delivery each week while offices not on the island of Oahu were requested by the main office to transmit uncertified, unstamped vital records, via airmail, but when information on the record was incomplete or unverified, a voucher was sent to the local office asking for clarification which would delay the record another week or two. Meanwhile, the record is held without a record number for all this time while other birth records are being stamped and filed.
Hawaii’s interisland airmail service from outlying islands to Honolulu was conducted from the following airports:
• Lihue Airport, Kauai County (91 miles to Honolulu)
• Kahului Airport, Island of Maui, Maui County (89 miles to Honolulu)
• Lanai Airport, Island of Lanai, Maui County (63 miles to Honolulu)
• Kalaupapa Airport, Island of Molokai, Kalawao County (54 miles to Honolulu)
• Hilo International Airport, Hawaii County (incorporated) (189 miles to Honolulu)
• Keahole International Airport or Waimea-Kohala Airport, Hawaii County (unincorporated) (151 miles to Honolulu).
In Hawaii, in 1961, birth registrations occurring outside of Honolulu County (off the Island of Oahu) were collected on a less frequent basis than births in Honolulu County, but the totals were divided into monthly statistics based on registration dates, for federal report data. Since the main health department office was in the city of Honolulu, on the island of Oahu, and more than 85% of the births in Hawaii occurred on Oahu, which is Honolulu County, it was beneficial for the registrar to account these births on a more frequent basis due to their higher volume. Birth registrations occurring inside of Honolulu County were accounted in the State of Hawaii’s main Department of Health Office each week. This is confirmed by the accounting of birth announcements in the newspapers with registrant addresses located in Honolulu County compared to those announcements for births whose registrant addresses are outside of Honolulu County.
This is a significant discovery given the disparate record number appearing on Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth”. The fact that his birth registration number is out of sequence with other births is an indication of anomalous circumstances involved in its assignment.
Additional to Hawaii’s geographic challenges, the state Health Department’s contract agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) stated that birth statistics were to be reported before July 31st of the following year in order to be included in publication for the previous year’s statistics report.
The 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. report shows there were 826 male child births in Hawaii in the month of August, 1961. A cross reference of addresses found in birth announcements published in the Hawaiian newspapers in August of 1961 with archives of residential listings shows that, out of all 826 births, only Barack Obama’s birth was registered to an address where the stated father did not live. According to reporting protocols this fact forces the Department of Health to allocate the usual residence of the mother as the location of the birth, no matter where the birth actually occurs. This was done to protect the custody rights of the mother and welfare of the child in cases when custody was challenged by a father residing in a foreign country. The child was declared a U.S. citizen by default of the mother’s usual place of residence and thereby protected under the U.S. Constitution.
This registration number is also out of sequence with other registered births in the same region Obama is alleged to have been born. This indicates that Obama’s registration number was assigned based on the occurrence of the birth registration in another location, and it was assigned up to a year after the actual occurrence of the birth using a number made available after the official reporting period, perhaps by a previous fetal death which authorities simply chose to classify as a non-Live birth event after the fact.
The registration number has no association with chronological ordering of birth occurrences. In 1961, the first three digits of a birth registration number represents the NCHS code for each Standard Metropolitan Statistics Reporting Area (151 for Honolulu), the following two digits were the year of the registration and, final five were the yearly accounting of birth registrations based the next available number for that region and registration period. This five digit number was expanded to six digits in later reporting periods to account for increase in yearly birth volumes.
Since Hawaii allowed birth registrations up to one year after the occurrence of the birth, it was impossible to keep sequential record numbers based on the time of each live birth event. For example, a birth which occurs in August of 1960 can be registered with Hawaii’s Health Department in August of 1961, but this birth would be given a 1961 registration number, not a 1960 number if the birth date was not established. 1960 registration numbers would be reported by July 31st of 1961.
WHAT THE EXPERTS SAY
Upon analysis of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” image by former Social Security Administration record investigators consulted for this report, artifacts appearing on the document indicate this document is not a reliable source of identity verification. They provided this assessment for our report:
“Mr.Johannson,
Thank you for inquiry regarding the contents of the document image you submitted on February 8th, 2012. We are familiar with the controversy surrounding this particular document and have included our best possible evaluation without access to the corroborating information.
ITEM 1: The image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to the internet in April, 2011, contains handwritten (penciled) numeric and alphanumeric characters which confirm that preliminary coding marks were applied to the document.
On authentic certificates filed by the Health Department, these penciled notations were used on the original, paper version of the record kept by the State-level office of the Department of Health after a photo static copy was provided for medical record archives to the facility shown on the certificate. Moreover, they were applied to even-numbered certificates in 1961, which were those from which statistics were reported to the National Center for Health Statistics. Typically, they are not found on an original certificate which was prepared by an attending medical authority present at the live birth event because the medical personnel do not report natal statistics, the state registrar’s office does.
Therefore, an official copy of the hospital version of this same document in coordination with the code file tape created by the National Vital Statistics office will confirm whether the birth information is accurate between the four agencies who processed it, including the local registrar office, the state registrar, the hospital and the U.S. Vital Statistics office in the appropriate reporting region. All should have copies of this record.
If Obama’s birth occurred in 1961, it would be subject to the NCHS reporting methods and coding for that year. Therefore, his birth statistics would have been tabulated in the State office but not necessarily recorded and published by the NCHS statistics report. However, if the tape file record of his birth were discovered in the NCHS tape file archive, this would be contradictory to what we have been told about his birth.
Therefore, according the SSA panel, it is unlikely the certificate would not have been coded with preliminary notations in 1961, since vital statistics were coded from microfilmed images and translated to punch cards which contained approximately 150+ digit spaces for each birth registration. These cards were tediously completed, in blocks of 20 birth records, with a majority of the records being required, by contract with the NCHS, to be completed by July 31st of the following year.
Beginning in 1960, punch cards were hand-fed into a scan machine and the resulting data was then stored on a magnetic tape reel by the NCHS. According to the official U.S. Vital Statistics System Development handbook, this procedure required several hours for each record and was in effect under Hawaii’s contract with the NCHS until 1971.
ITEM 2: It is important to remember that births are just one of four types of more than 40,000 vital records which required processing, copying and filing in Hawaii. State vital records registration officials simply could not afford to spend time applying preliminary handwritten codes to vital records which were not going to be included in the annual reporting block.
Adding to the challenge, unlike today’s electronic system, the initial coding process was manually performed in 1961. With more than 40,000 records in need of processing and microfilming, why would a municipality waste resources to do unnecessary accounting? The resources were simply not available to do this for all the births, deaths, marriages and divorces in the time frame required, so the even-numbered reporting method was introduced. Besides, the NCHS contract with the states paid only a few cents per record to the (state) Health Department. If these penciled numbers appear on a vital record, the content of that record was reported as part of the even-numbered certificates to the NCHS as required.
Based on this, it is conclusive that Obama’s certificate number is either fraudulently assigned by forgers, or it was changed to an odd number after the original contents of the document were entered in order to prevent inquiries into Obama’s record file tape. Under either circumstance, information about Obama’s birth is being intentionally obscured in order to hide his actual natal history and the negative impact it would have on his eligibility to be president.
It is our recommendation that the identity of this individual, including his natal history, as well as all major forms of primary identification including social security number, education records, licenses and travel records be formally and thoroughly investigated.
Based merely on the fact that Obama’s stated father, as shown in the image of this alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth was not an American citizen, Obama is not eligible to president of the United States. However, the NCHS coding and vital statistics reporting methods have left more than ample artifacts to formally investigate the truth about this most ambiguous shell of a man.
Perhaps it’s time for America to embrace the truth, engage the consequences of this deception and lies and, then…move on.
POSTED BY PENBROOK ONE AT 11:34 AM
“Mr.Johannson,
Thank you for inquiry regarding the contents of the document image you submitted on February 8th, 2012. We are familiar with the controversy surrounding this particular document and have included our best possible evaluation without access to the corroborating information.
ITEM 1: The image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to the internet in April, 2011, contains handwritten (penciled) numeric and alphanumeric characters which confirm that preliminary coding marks were applied to the document.
On authentic certificates filed by the Health Department, these penciled notations were used on the original, paper version of the record kept by the State-level office of the Department of Health after a photo static copy was provided for medical record archives to the facility shown on the certificate. Moreover, they were applied to even-numbered certificates in 1961, which were those from which statistics were reported to the National Center for Health Statistics. Typically, they are not found on an original certificate which was prepared by an attending medical authority present at the live birth event because the medical personnel do not report natal statistics, the state registrar’s office does.
Therefore, an official copy of the hospital version of this same document in coordination with the code file tape created by the National Vital Statistics office will confirm whether the birth information is accurate between the four agencies who processed it, including the local registrar office, the state registrar, the hospital and the U.S. Vital Statistics office in the appropriate reporting region. All should have copies of this record.
If Obama’s birth occurred in 1961, it would be subject to the NCHS reporting methods and coding for that year. Therefore, his birth statistics would have been tabulated in the State office but not necessarily recorded and published by the NCHS statistics report. However, if the tape file record of his birth were discovered in the NCHS tape file archive, this would be contradictory to what we have been told about his birth.
Therefore, according the SSA panel, it is unlikely the certificate would not have been coded with preliminary notations in 1961, since vital statistics were coded from microfilmed images and translated to punch cards which contained approximately 150+ digit spaces for each birth registration. These cards were tediously completed, in blocks of 20 birth records, with a majority of the records being required, by contract with the NCHS, to be completed by July 31st of the following year.
Beginning in 1960, punch cards were hand-fed into a scan machine and the resulting data was then stored on a magnetic tape reel by the NCHS. According to the official U.S. Vital Statistics System Development handbook, this procedure required several hours for each record and was in effect under Hawaii’s contract with the NCHS until 1971.
ITEM 2: It is important to remember that births are just one of four types of more than 40,000 vital records which required processing, copying and filing in Hawaii. State vital records registration officials simply could not afford to spend time applying preliminary handwritten codes to vital records which were not going to be included in the annual reporting block.
Adding to the challenge, unlike today’s electronic system, the initial coding process was manually performed in 1961. With more than 40,000 records in need of processing and microfilming, why would a municipality waste resources to do unnecessary accounting? The resources were simply not available to do this for all the births, deaths, marriages and divorces in the time frame required, so the even-numbered reporting method was introduced. Besides, the NCHS contract with the states paid only a few cents per record to the (state) Health Department. If these penciled numbers appear on a vital record, the content of that record was reported as part of the even-numbered certificates to the NCHS as required.
Based on this, it is conclusive that Obama’s certificate number is either fraudulently assigned by forgers, or it was changed to an odd number after the original contents of the document were entered in order to prevent inquiries into Obama’s record file tape. Under either circumstance, information about Obama’s birth is being intentionally obscured in order to hide his actual natal history and the negative impact it would have on his eligibility to be president.
It is our recommendation that the identity of this individual, including his natal history, as well as all major forms of primary identification including social security number, education records, licenses and travel records be formally and thoroughly investigated.
Based merely on the fact that Obama’s stated father, as shown in the image of this alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth was not an American citizen, Obama is not eligible to president of the United States. However, the NCHS coding and vital statistics reporting methods have left more than ample artifacts to formally investigate the truth about this most ambiguous shell of a man.
Perhaps it’s time for America to embrace the truth, engage the consequences of this deception and lies and, then…move on.
POSTED BY PENBROOK ONE AT 11:34 AM
Sheriff Arpaio: Obama birth certificate a ‘forgery’
By Stephen Dinan-
The Washington TimesThursday, March 1, 2012
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)STORY TOPICS
FOLLOW US ON
FACEBOOK
- COMMENTS (620)
- RECOMMEND
- READ LATER
- TEXT SIZE: +| -
- SHARE
PHOENIX — Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaiosaid Thursday he suspects the birth certificate President Obama released last year is a “computer-generated forgery” — and also raised questions about the authenticity of the president’sSelective Service card.
“Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,” SheriffArpaio said. “My investigators believe that the long-form birth certificate was manufactured electronically and that it did not originate in paper format as claimed by the White House.”
Questions over Mr. Obama’s birth certificate have been a political sideshow for the last four years, and have persisted despite repeated denials by the White House, and despite the release of evidence he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961. That evidence included both a certificate of live birth released during the 2008 campaign and the long-form certificate last year.
Fact-check organizations have concluded the certificates are authentic, and Mr. Obama has joked about those who questioned his birth. At last year’s White House Correspondents Association Dinner, soon after releasing his long-form certificate, he mocked Donald Trump, who had said his own investigators were looking into the matter.
Now Sheriff Arpaio, who first built his national profile by creating tent cities for jail inmates and later by taking a tough stance on illegal immigration, could reignite questions among those who continue to believe Mr. Obama was born outside the U.S., and therefore is ineligible to be president under the Constitution’s provision that the officeholder be a natural-born citizen.
Sheriff Arpaio said at least two crimes could have been committed in his view through the forgery. He repeatedly said he is not questioning whether Mr. Obama was born in the U.S., but instead is challenging the authenticity of the documents themselves.
He released a 10-page report detailing what his investigators said were “inconsistencies” in the text characters of the birth certificate image theWhite House released, and also questioned details of the computer file itself.
Some of those claims had earlier been raised on the Internet as well, and both the White House and independent fact-checkers have dismissed those questions, saying the computer file is consistent with the version of events the White House has detailed.
It released the long-form certificate last year after repeated questions were raised by conservative activists and conspiracy-theory websites questioning the authenticity of the short-form certificate Mr. Obamareleased during the 2008 campaign.
The Justice Department has accused Sheriff Arpaio of civil rights abuses within his department, but he said he began his investigation before that — in August 2011, after tea party members from Surprise, Ariz., a town within Maricopa County, signed a petition challenging the certificate.
Sheriff Arpaio detailed former law enforcement officers who constitute what he called his “cold case posse” to do the investigation. He said no taxpayer dollars were spent.
He was joined in his press conference by Jerome Corsi, an author who has been critical of Mr. Obama. He was also one of those who took a critical look at Sen. John Kerry’s military service during his 2004 presidential bid.
Mr. Corsi made headlines when he traveled to Kenya, saying he wanted to track down where he thought Mr. Obama was really born.
Sheriff Arpaio said he went into the investigation with an open mind, and would have been happy to clear Mr. Obama.
His investigators said the computer file released by the White Houseappears to have been created on a computer, rather than having been originally made on paper and then scanned.
The investigators said they have identified “a person of interest” in the birth certificate.
Sheriff Arpaio’s chief investigator on the project said there are so many questions that he couldn’t have cleared Mr. Obama to be an employee of Maricopa County.
Pursuing questions over the birth certificate has been a thorny issue for the GOP. State lawmakers in several places, including Arizona, have pursued laws that would have imposed checks on any presidential candidate’s qualifications to get on their state ballots.
One such proposal in Arizona, which became known as the “birther” bill, was vetoed by Gov. Jan Brewer last year.
CERTIFIGATE
SHERIFF JOE: 'PROBABLE CAUSE' OBAMA CERTIFICATE A FRAUD
Asking Arpaio to elevate to criminal probe, person of interest ID'd
Published: 2 hours ago- inShare 26
- Text smaller
- Text bigger
Ads by Google
- What's Your Cause?State Farm® Is Giving Away $25,000 Grants. Tell Us About Your Cause!www.facebook.com/StateFarm
NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” WND plans to have the entire event available in 15-minute increments beginning Friday morning atthis online location.
PHOENIX – An investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
- Handwriting Examiner $295Professional Forgery Opinion Document Examination cases solvedexpertdocumentexaminer.com
- Is He Cheating On You?1) Enter His Email Address 2) See Hidden Social Profiles & Pics Now!Spokeo.com/Cheating-Spouse-Search
The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.
Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws,commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.
In addition to the live-streaming, WND is making available to the public a report distributed to media today by Arpaio’s investigators.
GET A FREE COPY OF THE ARPAIO REPORT THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TO PRESS TODAY
The posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, has interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents. It also has taken numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s lead investigator, said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.
“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.
The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
The investigation was launched after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition to Arpaio in August 2011 asking him to undertake the investigation.
The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was used to place Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
Arpaio believes a congressional investigation might be warranted and has asked that any information relevant to the investigation held by other law enforcement agencies be forwarded to his office.
The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.
“A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery,” Arpaio said.
Among the evidence released at the press conference are five videos – which can be seen at the end of this article – to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.
The videos consist of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document. They display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.
The investigators contend the videos illustrate their conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan is enhanced by Optical Character Recognition, OCR, and optimized.
Additionally, the posse says, the videos demonstrate that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar’s name stamp and the registrar’s date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.
“That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself,” Zullo said, emphasizing that if the registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.
The investigators also chronicled a series of allegedly inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding any original birth records held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”
Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted,” Zullo said.
“In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States.”
In addition, investigators say they have developed credible evidence that President Obama’s Selective Service card was a forgery, based on an examination of the postal date stamp on the document. Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth.
Videos connected to the investigation:
1. Introduction – Regular Scan:
2. Layers, Stamp & Noise
3. OCR Theory
4. Optimization
5. Conclusion
6. Selective Service
Previous stories:
What does law say about Obama’s eligibility?
Alinsky-style leftist ramps up effort to oust Sheriff Joe
100,000 line up to back Sheriff Joe
Obama backer arrested for death threats against Sheriff Joe
Justice Department blinks in battle against Sheriff Joe
Anti-Arpaio protesters ousted from meeting
Another protest against Sheriff Joe fails
Obama’s harassment of Sheriff Joe
‘Resign now’ protest against Sheriff Joe fizzles
Sheriff Joe targeted for ouster
Sheriff Joe ‘suspicious’ of motive behind Obama attacks
Sheriff Joe to Obama: I’ll keep doing my job
Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation
Sheriff Joe on Obama eligibility probe: ‘Where there’s smoke … ‘
http://www.facebook.com/notes/miguel-gonzalez/the-text-of-sheriff-joe-arpaios-investigation-into-obamas-eligibility/10150560310746831
The Text of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Investigation into Obama's Eligibility
by Miguel Gonzalez on Thursday, March 1, 2012 at 3:59pm ·Just got emailed this and had to share."President Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011, is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery, not a scan of an original 1961 paper document as represented by the White House when the long-form birth certificate was made public," Arizona's Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said at a press conference today in Phoenix.
This is the major preliminary finding of a six-month ongoing Sheriff's Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president.
Having developed probable cause to believe the long-form birth certificate was most likely a computer-generated forgery, investigators began examining other evidence of President Obama's life history.
Investigators additionally have developed credible evidence suggesting:
• President Obama's Selective Service card was most likely a forgery, revealed by an examination of the postal date stamp on the document;
• Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961.
Beginning in October 2011, the Sheriff's Cold Case Posse, consisting of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, examined dozens of witnesses and hundreds of documents, as well as taking numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
In August 2011, 250 members of the Surprise, Arizona, Tea Party, residents of Maricopa County, presented a signed petition asking Sheriff Arpaio to undertake the investigation.
The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was utilized to obtain a position for Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
The Cold Case investigators further determined that the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in what Sheriff's investigators believe is a systematic effort to hide from public inspection whatever original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may have in their possession.
"Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures, to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have," said Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse.
The Cold Case investigators have not yet determined who, when, or precisely how the long-form computer-generated birth certificate released on April 27 may have been forged, but investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
The Cold Case Posse investigators advised Sheriff Arpaio that the forgers most likely committed two crimes: first, in fraudulently creating a forgery that the White House characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record; and second, in fraudulently presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery the White House represented as "proof positive" of President Obama's authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.
"A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery, and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery," Arpaio said.
Among the evidence released at the press conference were five videos the Cold Case Posse produced to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.
The videos consisted of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document.
The videos were designed to display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.
The videos illustrate point-by-point the investigators' conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan of the paper document had been enhanced by Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and optimized.
Additionally, the videos demonstrated that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar's name stamp and the Registrar's date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to actual rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.
"That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the Registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself," Zullo said, stressing that if the Registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.
The investigators also chronicled a series of inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding what, if any, original birth records are held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
"As I said at the beginning of the investigation," Arpaio said, "the president can put all this to rest quite easily. All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm, and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession."
Arpaio further stressed the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm, and electronic records, in order to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
Arpaio went on to say the President should also authorize Kapiolani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any and all hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, in order to provide additional corroboration for the original 1961 birth records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
"Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted," Zullo said.
"In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States."
Arpaio concluded the press conference by suggesting a congressional investigation might be warranted and asked that any other law enforcement agency with information referencing this investigation be forwarded to his office.
Like · · Share
52 shares
Jodi Kyman Thanks
Pamela Villela Thanks and this is going somewhere, I have faith!
Katrina Lim I'm still watching and you guys should hear how the reporters are attacking Sheriff Joe. Sheriff Joe is rip'n 'em a new one.
Mark as Spam
Pamela Villela Yep, he is our pittbull for justice, they will NOT go away!
Katrina Lim I love this guy...Loving how folks are CLAPPING and drowning out the pissed reporters
Mary Grasmick PLEASE GOD, Keep Sheriff Joe SAFE! Amen!
Katrina Lim Amen Mary!
Pamela Villela I tell ya what if the news does not carry this I am ready to form a march on the muslims home turf, no not Kenya but the WH!!!
Katrina Lim I'm with you Pamela I have a lot of vacation time.
Pamela Villela They asked if he will turn over to Atty General, yeah right! That turd must go too, wow these folks are brainless koolaid drinkers!
Miguel Gonzalez Think of it this way, and it makes it that much more relevant today, Breitbart was attacked by the same types of reporters at the Anthony Weiner press conference for having reported that Weiner had engaged in illicit conduct on the web, AFTER Weiner had just admitted that he did do what Breitbart had said he'd done.
How freaking sick is that???
Donna Archambault Well maybe they should look into his financial aid for college. If this is all true...the American people have been taken for the biggest ride in history. God help us all!
Katrina Lim Amen Donna.
Pamela Villela And look what happened to Breitbart, no accident, no heart attack, not buying it!
Pamela Villela Sheriff Joe should get to bottom and have Obummer in pink before summer comes:)
Mary Grasmick Donna, that has been tried BUT all records of every kind are simply missing!!!!
Donna Archambault There is so much missing and that alone should be a RED flag to all Americans. Has anyone even seen pics of his kids when they were little or bunches of wedding pics. What about friends!
Katrina Lim missing or sealed. why would his transcripts be sealed?
Pamela Villela He is pure muslim fraud!
Angelica Cortez HE IS THE BIGGEST SCAM.... AND I ALSO HEARD THAT THEY PUT HIM DOWN AS AN AFRICAN AMERICAN, AND WHEN HE WAS BORN THEY DIDN'T USE THOSE WORDS ON THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, THEY USE TO WRITE DOWN NEGRO AS THE RACE... THERE ARE WAY TO MANY WRONG THINGS GOING ON WITH ALL OF THIS
Katrina Lim EXACTLY Angelica. Negro is even on mines and I' was born WAY after this guy.
Pamela Villela Pray for Sheriff Joe as this is so disturbing that we know what they will try to do next to stop him!
Kim Hedum Thanks for posting...had it ready to watch but ended up dealing with a problem and missed it.
Kenneth Captain Bentley Harden Kenya wasn't a country then. Another in a long list of bs.
Miguel Gonzalez I wasn't home at the time the press conference started, so I was glad to get a text version so quickly.
Janice Manz I watch the entire press conference and the evidence is pretty clear an convincing but no details on the alleged perp. Press was clearly lapdogs for Obama except for WND, of course, and Washington Times.
Janice Manz We need people all over the nation to stand with Sheriff Joe.
Thanks SO much for posting and tagging me. I'm gonna repost this also. I can't say I learned anything new except that the records for the week of his birth are missing. I don't know how I missed that before, but I've known (as I'm sure the...See More
George Wilson Yawn Yawn....nothing major we did not already know from a myraid souces including the bastards wife who said he was born in Kenya and his granny who said she was there at his birth in Kenya....
The problem all along has been the unwillingness of most Americans to accept the fact that we've been duped. It's human nature to evade responsibility for your indiscretions or failings, especially when it's something like this that is such...See More
Michael Payne We must support Joe and if anything happens to him then we need to continue what Joe started. The squatter must be removed!!!
Laura Boatright I already posted on my Congressman's wall: Congressman, I am listening to Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigation report- WE MUST HAVE A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION ON THE FRAUDULENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF OBAMA....NOT BECAUSE HE IS OBAMA, OR A DEMOCRAT, OR BLACK, BUT BECAUSE WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PEOPLE WE VOTE FOR ARE ***QUALIFIED*** FOR THE JOB.
Stacy Truthseeker Long I'm glad you brought up the biblical aspect Dena. This passage has been popping into my head for the last few weeks so I thought I'd share it with everyone since it sure seems to apply to our current circumstances:
Miguel Gonzalez If you would not be forgotten as soon as you are dead, either write something worth reading or do things worth writing. - Benjamin Franklin
And how I'm feeling about Breitbart's legacy and the duty of good men like Joe Arpaio, who put their butts on the line.
Laura Boatright It's ALL our duties...not just the few "famous" ones...just sayin'
WHY AM I STILL HARPING ON OBAMA’S LACK OF CITIZENSHIP?? BECAUSE IT IS TAX EVASION, DEFRAUDING SOCIAL SECURITY, AND MISREPRESENTATION OF CANDIDACY/ELECTION FRAUD BREAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST BY CONDUCT UNBECOMING OF AN ELECTED OFFICIAL...
TELL SEC. KEMP TO STRIKE OBAMA'S NAME FROM THE BALLOT:
| hide details 5:43 PM (5 hours ago) |
*
*
*nathan <nathan@nathandeal.org>
*"WSB-TV Talk2Us (CTV-Atlanta)" <talk2us@wsbtv.com>
*Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:43 PM
*TELL SEC. KEMP TO STRIKE OBAMA'S NAME FROM THE BALLOT:
*gmail.comTELL SEC. KEMP TO STRIKE OBAMA'S NAME FROM THE BALLOT:
Probable Cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joes-posse-probable-cause-obama-certificate-a-fraud/
THIS WAS A RESPONSE SENT TO ME BY A READER, REGARDING THE BAIN-FUNDED SUPER PAC MACHINE, AS BAIN GOBBLES UP BUSINESSES IN BUY-UPS AND TRADES MONEY OFF OF INVESTMENTS FOR PROFITS WHILE THOSE INVOLVED COMMIT TAX EVASION, NEWT-ROMNEY-OBAMA HAVE ALL RECEIVED MONEY FROM BAIN....
ROMNEY BEING ONE OF THE WORST OFFENDERS, AVOIDING PAYING 20% OF ANNUAL INCOME FOR 10YRS. TO THE IRS WHERE HE MAY OWE $20 MILLION+. OBAMA HAS USED THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF A DECEASED PERSON, AND NEWT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF TAKING CASH FROM BAIN: ESSENTIALLY, BAIN IS IS THE BANE OF ALL SMALL BUSINESSES AND TO BLAME FOR OUR ECONOMY AS WELL...
BAIN IS A SUPER CORPORATION, CORPORATE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES UNDER ONE UMBRELLA, BEING HELD BY ERICK ERICKSON, NO LESS! NO MATTER WHO WINS THE ELECTION, BAIN WINS, AND WE LOSE!! THAT IS WHY IT HAS TAKEN 3YRS. TO GET HONEST PRESS, A THOROUGH INQUIRY OF OBAMA’S CITIZENSHIP, AND THE TRUTH ABOUT CANDIDATES, BECAUSE OF BAIN’S INVOLVEMENT IN BUYING PRESS THROUGH CLEAR CHANNEL RADIO AFFILIATES AND THROUGH CONTROLLING DONATIONS TO CAMPAIGNS, LIKE A GIANT SUPERPAC FUNNEL...
IN BUSINESS, THIS IS CALLED A MONOPOLY, AND NOW BAIN IS MAKING A MONOPOLY NOT JUST OFF OF BUSINESSES, BUT LAWS AND POLITICIANS, TURNING GOOD LEADERS INTO CORRUPT POLITICAL WHORES FOR MONEY AND BRIBING OTHERS FOR VOTES!
Do You know Truth When You Hear It?
Do you know truth when you hear it? With all the spin going on in our world today, it is making it more and more difficult to discern the truth. Twisting and spinning in the media, changing meaning, slanting outcomes, not reporting what actually occurs, but instead reporting what furthers 'their' agenda, seems to be the action of most in today’s world. It hits us from all sides, the TV, computer, radio and the Internet. Daily, we are bombarded with the fog of continual spin.
Obama and his administration are even trying to tell us how to speak, 'changing' the meaning of words, as in, what means what… as he tries to 'change' how we refer to, for example: ‘terrorists’. Who are the 'terrorists'? Obama and his administration are trying to rename patriots as 'terrorists' ... Anyone that doesn't buy, or is against the Obama spin is deemed a 'terrorist', instead of the 'real terrorists' being deemed as such. Obama and his administration are proving by actions and words to be the real terrorists.
We are being told not to refer to things as they really are and to not hear and see what we really see hear, or feel. We're to believe what 'they' tell us to believe, instead of, what we know to be true. Just forget what’s true and believe ‘them’ instead. But they can tell you anything, and until you believe it, it's not true.
Obama used the word 'hope' when he campaigned to get where he is. Hope?! Obama is taking away hope and in its place he is putting control over every aspect of your life.
It's like a playboy trying to seduce his prey. He will compliment and tell her any and everything to get her, even "I love you." 
Speaking of playboys...Clinton for example: Remember the Monica Lewinsky scandal? And Clinton pointing his finger at us through the TV screen as he said, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” When obviously, he did. And most all of us knew that he did and knew that he was lying. But lied, he did, and he lied as easily as he opened his mouth. Then impeachment hearings were started and that's when Clinton stated. "It depends on what the word 'is' means?" A Leviathan master at work.
Now, Clinton is caught up in another scandal. That he told a man to step out of a political race to let another win in order to suit ‘their’ agenda. Clinton, of course, 'denies' doing this. And others deny it to protect themselves from the light of the truth. Liars always deny. How can anyone ever believe Clinton? He has proven to be a blatant liar. Yet, he is still supporting candidates and blabbing spin in the media. It’s Leviathan at its finest.
Look at Obama and Pelosi… they contradict themselves even in the same speech. Truth seems not to matter to these people and they must think that the masses can't see through their lies, Leviathan spin, and self-serving agenda.
Anyone with a brain knows that we can’t give better healthcare to everyone at a lesser cost. It’s impossible. It’s a lie. It’s Leviathan. It’s twisted logic. It’s twisting words to lead astray. This bill is to enslave the people to the government and it is of pure evil.
Oh, it’s a lovely idea and hooks fools into 'believing' that's it possible, but it can’t be done and it won’t be done. It’s only a ruse to take more of your rights and freedoms away and to give more control to the government.
Anyone with a brain knows that you don’t pass bills and sign them without reading them.Anyone with a brain knows that you don’t continue going into more and more debt to balance the budget. Anyone with a brain knows that what works is a smaller government that serves the people not the other way around.
Leviathan seems to be getting stronger and stronger. This word spin devil causes confusion, twisting, spinning words and meanings, so that little truth is heard, and confusion abounds. The more confusion, the easier it is for people to be led to distraction then destruction. Many politicians and much of the media are in collusion with the devil Leviathan.
Especially this current administration is counting on the inability of the people to discern truth as their Leviathanian tactics get stronger and stronger. 'They’ think that if they say it often enough, spin it enough that the people will believe it. This exact statement has come out of Leviathan-controlled Obama’s mouth.
Obama denies that he knew what was being preached at Rev. Wright's church and those caught in the Leviathan spin spell, believe him.
There are liars everywhere these days. Truth is the rarity. And when the truth is spoken, or revealed the Leviathan spinners come out to try and make the truth appear the lie. It's spin, twist, deny and confuse.
We must get back to the truth of the constitution. Our founding fathers created checks and balances to curtail a take-over by liars. The founding principles are sound and have made America and its people the finest and greatest in the world.
One of the most important issues is that we be governed by natural born citizens. There sure is alot of smoke about this issue, even more than around the Clinton-Lewinsky cover-up. Where there is smoke, there is fire. So, ummm... is Leviathan spinning or what?
We are being led astray by many in the international field that want to weaken America for 'their' benefit and Obama's backers are leading the way to the biggest push ever to this goal.
America is founded on Judeo-Christian principles and there is a reason for this and this is the reason that America is what it is. THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE BRAVE!
The Seven Deadly Sins are running rampant in our country and it is time to reveal them to the light of TRUTH! Instead of the Leviathan spin, that it's okay to live this way. We’ve been led astray by the evil Leviathan spin to believe that morals, standards, truth and honor don't matter, when they are all that really does matter.
How do you discern the truth from all the lies? I say listen through the words, watch the actions and agenda, and how it feels to you deep down in your spirit. If your spirit is true and you are true to your spirit, you will be able to discern theTRUTH!
And when someone shows you what a Leviathan they are BELIEVE THEM as in CLINTON!
Come back to your innate God given instinct of discernment. We must hear through the evil of the Leviathan twist and spin to bring our country back to the truth.
'They' are afraid that we will see the truth. That is why they twist, churn and spin.
Wake up people! Hear through the spin and lies! Hear the TRUTH!
Categories: EXPLOSIONS
Tags: media propaganda propaganda lies Obama Leviathan corrupt media twist word spin lying agenda PelosiClinton spin
Pillheads in the Senate
MAR
1
Super-PAC Tuesday And The American Bribery Trap
at 10:24AM
Illustration by DonkeyHotey for The Politics Blog
Citizens United has created a great vortex for the country from which there may be no real escape.
(Optional soundtrack to this blog post...)
Oh, look, just when we'd all become accustomed to talking about ladyparts and what people do with them, it seems that the fact that the American political process has been rendered a whorehouse with 5,000 piano players — thanks, Supreme Court; can't wait to see what you clucks do with my my health care up here in the Commonwealth — is salient to the process again. Willard Romney, who tickles the ivories in this particular joy palace like Scott Joplin on a very good day, is already heavily invested in the purchase of Ohio and, as we all know, as Ohio 'hos, so 'hos the nation.
(Or, to paraphrase Robert Bolt's Thomas More, "Why, Willard, it profit a man naught to sell his soul for the entire world, but for Toledo?")
Seriously, Willard. Almost four million bucks already? In one state? Why, it seems like only yesterday that you were celebrating your twin victories in Michigan and Arizona by publicly grubbing for small donations, which was pathetic and grasping and low even for a campaign that at this point could play limbo with a salamander. The fact that Rick Santorum and his PAC — which I believe is called ColossalDickPAC 2012, but I could be wrong about that; have I mentioned recently what a colossal dick he is? — have already poured $527,000 into the state, and the fact that N. Leroy Gingrich, Undead Definer Of Civilization's Rules and Leader (Perhaps) of the Civilizing Forces, has been able to pony up nearly as much, would be startling in any other year. But their efforts are dwarfed by the sheer magnitude of the fact that Willard has already been able to spend four times as much as both of them combined. A lot of local-TV ad salesmen are going to be sending their kids to college on John Roberts Fellowships when this exercise in political trollopy is finally over.
It was as though a gentleman's agreement was struck after Florida, which was the last time Romney decided just to money-whip openly the rest of the field, that the discussion of how Citizens United has deformed and perverted our democracy was now over, and this is just the way it is, and get used to it. If money came up at all in the last few weeks, it was in a discussion of what the candidates were doing with it. We heard a lot about what one candidate's attack ads said about another candidate. We heard some whinging from the other candidate, which was followed by an attack ad of his own. What fell out of polite discussion was the deadly serious question of what kind of democracy comes out the other side if the only real measure of a candidate is how much money he can raise, and how much money he can spend.
The example of this presidential election is not promising. Not only is Romney capable of buying himself a lead every time a race gets tight, but the cold, hard reality is that, without their personal sugar daddies, both Santorum and Gingrich would long ago have been left by the side of the highway, drinking sad beers in a cafe with Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, who keeps pinching the waitresses, and Jon Huntsman. This is the way we do politics today. This is the way we keep score. And, once the politics are over, and the various 'hos get back to their real jobs, the rot that money brings into the electoral system starts undermining the government itself. When we talk about "campaign finance reform" in isolation, we overlook the really dangerous corruption of the system that comes when the campaigns finally end. People don't stop being for sale just because they're not running anymore. If they're bought, they stay bought. At that point, this stops being about "campaign finance" and starts being about, for all practical purposes, bribery. It will not be long before we've raised an entire generation of elected officials who don't know any other way to do politics than the way we're doing politics right now. How will reform ever come from them? They won't even be able to recognize the concept. Citizens United has created a great trap for the country from which there may be no real escape.
The rot is spreading. There will be several multimillion Senate races this fall. House races will break the bank. The campaign to recall Scott Walker, the goggle-eyed homunculus now working as local sales rep for the Wisconsin subsidiary of Koch Industries, is going to cost well over what it once cost to run for president. (The Koch brothers have already declared that they're in for Whatever It Takes which, in their case, is quite a lot.) The worst thing of all is that we all seem to be acclimating ourselves to the new order of things. Oh, there are the plucky efforts to reverse CU by constitutional amendment, which I applaud standing up, but which will take years, and which anyway are hamstrung by the new, gluttonous paradigm that they're trying to overturn. Three-quarters of the states have to vote to approve a constitutional amendment. Call me cynical, but, by the time the amendment gets close enough to be sent out to the states for ratification, at least three-quarters of the state legislatures will have been elected under the new rules, and you'll be able to hear the piano music tinkling from three blocks away.
Tags: mitt romney | super pac | ohio | super tuesday | long reads | rick santorum
ON MICHIGAN AND ARIZONA PRIMARIES:
Sarah Palin and Jan Brewer: both alike, in that when you defend them, one turns around and supports Newt and the other Romney, both bad !!!
Share · @2012_TeaParty on Twitter · via TwitterLast night's draw in MI reminds us Santorum nationally has gained-Santorum won 57 out of 83 counties-huge in perspective of general election
Share · @2012_TeaParty on Twitter · via Twitter
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @MittRomney the reason people think Mormonism is a cult is because people like you worship money, Ron Paul will do better than you in GA!!!
@RickSantorum Only Romney would pick the richest county to make his play to rich people here in GA....
Join me Friday for a rally in Ohio at 1pm ET at Chillicothe High School, 421 Yoctangee Pkwy, Chillicothe #OHGop #OHPrimary
Retweeted by Tea Party Chief
@MittRomney You are to blame, along with Obama and Newt both, taking Bain's money and hurting small businesses and our country's economy!!
@MittRomney While it is funny what you said about Newt, he may not have felt that about the entire Reagan Admin., just at that time.
@MittRomney among GA voters, we already know that you are a super-rich S.O.B., and we're tired of being reminded by your ads of that...
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @RepPaulRyan Social Security Entitlement Restrictions and Structural Reform Act of 2012 docs.google.com/document/d/1oc… https://t.co/pU5NN6u
· Open
Despite a clear legal requirement, for 4th straight year Pres. Obama has failed to lead on need to strengthen Medicare: ow.ly/9nZsT
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @RepPaulRyan Repeal #4872 Replace with Proposed Bill facebook.com/l.php?u=https%… and permit #ETC elder tax credits $10,000 annually
9:53 AM - 1 Mar 12 via web · Details
THE TEA PARTY CHIEF TELLS THE SENATE TO MAKE OTHERS PAY FOR THEIR OWN CONTRACEPTION AND THEIR OWN HEALTH CARE:
WE SUPPORT FULL REPEAL AND DEFUNDING OF #HR 4872 WITH THIS LEGISLATION COMPOSED SINCE AUGUST 2010 docs.google.com/document/d/1jK…
Why is this a jobless recovery with 25 million people out of work? It’s because of uncertainty about the Reconciliation Act of 2010:
PROPOSITION FOR A REPEAL BILL ________ TO REPLACE H.R. 4872:
While Obama is definitely right about the urgency to tackle health reform, (as costs are exorbitantly high and we have no program for the uninsured), if we do not create a program to cover the uninsured or reform health care, we will add another $3 trillion to the deficit! The cost of not reforming health care over the next decade will double, adding half of the current deficit, to the $13 trillion dollar deficit, and if we do nothing about it now, half of the deficit by 2020 is projected to be nothing but health care debt: created by 20 years of unwise Congressional spending and legislation, a whopping $20 trillion dollars in the red!
It is not enough to say to the Federal Reserve to print more money for a bailout when the cost of food and gas are inflated, and since we’re a global economy that enjoys fiat, meaning that the American dollar is the only currency that is backed by the government who can write own notes, and while this is a supreme position of financial power and financial and influence, this also makes us vulnerable to attack from other countries who covet our position and status. Essentially, if you control the value of the American dollar, by buying up gold, property, or investments backed by gold, you have the power to control the global economy, and depending on how much you have, it’s like using reigns on a horse. The more wealth you have, the more you control sectors of society, like strings of puppets. I have seen Obama depicted as Puppet Master, but the true Master of Money is the person who is the wealthiest in gold, American property, and investments. While it is true that Obama has written a lot of blank checks, in 2004 it was estimated that the government has 261,007,000,000 ounces of gold/$2,800 per ounce, so the gold value was $730,819,600,000 with $733,170,953,704 American dollars in circulation, which leaves $730,086,429,046,296, or about $730 trillion dollars in reserve.
If we were to sell off our gold to pay down the deficit, the United States is only then worth around $700 trillion dollars. With our current financial problems and people being unemployed, the government is not collecting any real tax revenue from 25 million people over the past 2-3yrs. Qualified unemployment recipients who receive $800 per month cost the government $20,000,000,000/$20 billion per month, and in one year $240,000,000,000,000/$240 billion, so for 3yrs. of unemployment that comes to an ungodly $720,000,000,000/$720 billion dollars, which by the end of this year will add $1 trillion to the deficit! The government can’t tax it’s own money, or make enough back off of taxes from unemployment checks, as it was a government pay-out to begin with! The government gives out close to $1 trillion and gets back only 1/10. The government is essentially loaning out money that was paid in by taxpayers, getting $100,000,000,000/$100 billion in revenue back for $1 trillion paid out.
Continuing this disastrous trend with unemployment will add to the deficit at nearly the same rate as the health care debt, which would put the projected deficit to then $25 trillion. Within the next 30-50 years, just with unemployment pay-outs and health care costs, the deficit will consume the entire value of gold that backs the U.S. dollar, and we’ll be penniless and gold-less, and we’ll have no capital to loan or be able to loan to other countries! Whoever buys our gold will essentially be buying our debt! Even if we used the tax revenue generated off of unemployment checks, that $100 billion, and bought gold with it, we would only add $35 million and some back, which won’t make but $142 million over the next 12 years to offset trillions of dollars spent on unemployment and health care!
So folks, this is where the rubber meets the road: health care has been so high that people have been having to choose between their health or having a roof over their head, a car to drive, and food in their stomachs. This is the main reason the I.R.S. disagrees with Obama’s wage control plan to levy the taxes to pay for health care, as even the I.R.S. knows that even if you took in more taxes to pay for a new health care program for the uninsured, Obama’s legislation fails to deal with the costs of MEDICARE/MEDICAID rising, along with private sector premiums and out-of-pocket costs, so the money it costs to treat the uninsured being used as tax write-offs for hospitals would only address one kink in the hose, like putting a band-aid on a gaping wound that really needs stitches: there are 25 million unemployed who may or may not return to work, but there are really 3 groups of people who make up the uninsured bracket of society. Illegals make up 12 million, 10 million Americans don’t have any insurance, and the other 25 million will get insurance at another job when they return to work or the ones who remain unemployed will be dropped from COBRA. Those who are insured now pay 8% higher premiums, as the hospitals charge insurance companies a percentage to offset the cost of operation for treating those not insured. Now with higher unemployment, insurance companies have jacked up their rates because of a lower pool for their policy.
The question is, why has universal care not worked for MA? MA is now carrying a deficit, against federal law, as universal care does not cover the cost of disability or address the costs of the aging population. MA’s premiums only went down $230 per year/per person, with much higher taxes, running a deficit, AND they STILL put disability appropriations on the chopping block, though that still didn’t stop their deficit or really improve care, lower premium costs substantially, or even offset medical costs to balance their budget. Universal care just shuffles federal money out around the state, and it fails to deal with the cost issues of elderly care or special needs. Which is why C.B.O. numbers are b.s.!
Keeping all of these things in mind of what we can’t keep doing and what has proven not to work, we can’t just do it Obama’s way to our country’s own undoing! America will meet her demise at Obama’s hand if we blindly follow him like sheep to the slaughter! We are to be wise as serpents, but harmless as doves, and while we’ve got to reform health care and do it N-O-W, even tort reform won’t stop this health care abyss!
As a lobbyist in GA in over the past 8 months, I have conferred with Republicans to give approval to fund H.R. 3200, H.R. 3400, H.R. 1200 (striking the mandate clause), and H.R. 3962 with much revision. I addressed committee members to agree to compromise with health care reform, and I garnered Republican concession to accept passage of 3 Democrats’ bills to their 1 bill, with the condition that H.R. 3590 be tabled until it could be revised to address cost issues effectively. The bill was so bad, it was written by Rangel, and it was determined in committee to be a conflict of interest, and I actually believe that Obama was so jealous that I prompted legislators to support this compromise, that it trumped anything he’d ever done in 10yrs. voting present in the Senate, so he refused to have Pelosi support convening on H.R. 3590, which would’ve gotten the bill thrown out entirely over ethical challenge, and he took it upon himself to write another version of it, H.R. 4872/the Recon. Act of 2010, and they used deem and pass to usurp the will of the American people, as the majority of Americans rejected it, as the majority of Americans rejected insurance mandating, federal funding of abortion, cutting $500 billion from from MEDICARE, and funding Thomson prison to house terrorists with pharmaceutical contracts for generic pills to medicate everyone into compliance, (to get them hooked on pills so they need an insurance contract!) I suggest you read the legislation for yourself, and all you have to do is read the first 150 pgs. of H.R. 4872 to see how the health care law is interpreted and will be applied in conjunction with the other bills, which sucks!
We must repeal H.R. 4872 for those reasons listed above, as those are legitimate concerns that revoke Obama’s promise of insuring the uninsured. None of that legislation pays for itself... where is the money coming from --- a $13 trillion dollar deficit?! Cutting $500 billion from MEDICARE will only make MEDICARE costs skyrocket and appropriate $500 billion divided by 47 million uninsured is like the government paying one $10 copay for a general doctor visit, and that’s it! Plus if abortion funding is not struck, that will cost $3 billion or more per year! I worked on revising this health care legislation for 3 months straight, so much so, I felt my legs were shackled to my parents’ computer desk. I would spend up to 18 hours a day some days on the computer, reading bills over 2,000 pages long, making revisions, and then taking an hour to email the entire Senate and an entire day to email the House of Representatives. I made a promise to investors to protect the stock market from this legislation, I promised business owners who were still left that taxes wouldn’t close down their business in this unprofitable economy, and I promised Obama I would turn over every abortion clinic for misappropriation if an amendment was not passed.
While I became certain we could not reform health care Obama’s way and that the law needs to be repealed before it becomes budgetary law before August 9th, 2010, I see that neither the Dems or Repubs know how to fix the problems that they’ve created and failed to govern judiciously, both sides offering inadequate solutions, with Dems offering the most undesirable solution that they’re forcing everyone to do, though their reckless spending and tripling the deficit in less than 2yrs. has increased the desperation that has made health care reform a 9-1-1 emergency! It’s weird: instead of doing their jobs to govern wisely, they’ve spent all of our tax dollars and then used that as the very reason to tax us more and pass more legislation that will tax us to death! Obama gave out a lot of money, but he didn’t tell you he’d try to recoup it with 4 new taxes on the middle class!
I was sure that repealing the bill would prevent further economic disaster, and selling insurance across state lines would help everyone, but no one had a vision of what the future American health care should look like, until I read “Why Our Health Matters” by Andrew Weil, M.D. In this book, Weil establishes medical standards that come from years of experience in conventional and non-conventional medicine, and a blue print for a system that will work in favor of the health of our nation, with health equaling wealth! It also gives a structural delegation of duties that will accomplish what Obama’s czar disciples can’t do, as a small group overseeing the entire state of the American public health. While Weil’s book was loaded with reliable facts, figures, history, and even structural system reform, it still did not tell how to measurably bring cost down or how to implement technology for our benefit to be cost effective. However, this book inspired me to discuss it with my peers, and while some are still holding out hope for Social Security, I have my own legislation to bring to the table. It’s very simple, I wrote it on half a sheet of paper with a marker, but I guarantee that it’s better than anything Obama, Congress, or the I.R.S. thought of to rectify cost issues. The C.B.O. can estimate that costs may go down some, but the C.B.O. can’t tell us how to get there or how to walk it out; however, I can.
I , Aja Brooks, would like to introduce a bill _______ for a National Health Insurance Plan, outsourced to __________. The purpose of this bill is to provide insurance for the uninsured, in the event their state has no program in their budget, or if they can’t attain MEDICAID or have been rejected by other private sector insurance companies. Monthly insurance premiums will be federally subsidized, as optional health coverage available through selecting an additional withholding on your W-4/corresponding tax forms. A National Health Advisory Council will be in charge of overseeing this program, who will interact with State Insurance Commissioners and ____________ outsourced insurance company. The National Health Advisory Council will not be a government position; doctors will submit a recommendation to a Senate committee nominating 10 most qualified doctors or influential health professionals from their field. The 10 most nominated will be the council. The Council will establish a Constitution to uphold the Hippocratic Oath and establish its own rules for terms of service and rules of operation.
The I.R.S. expansion will remain the same as in H.R. 4872, but the I.R.S. will have 3 new departments: wage division, premium division, and records division. The I.R.S. will do what it does best, collecting and recording accurate monetary and related information, and they will do do so by using the taxpayer ID# as a person’s National Health Insurance number. This way, the I.R.S. will be able to easily assess and collect information having to review and substantiate gazillions of 1099 forms, and without having to harass or hunt people down, the I.R.S. would be the only entity to have access to private medical data through use of the Tax ID number, which will track and compile medical data as soon as we add it for hospitals to submit it for billing/tax purposes.
The I.R.S. will analyze all Tax ID claims, those who have opted-in to National Health Insurance, and track the costs to those under other insurance, and also track the costs of those who refuse health insurance and compile it for an annual report for Congress. Congress could then accurately assess medical costs, with the I.R.S. curtailing fraud, and simplify billing for hospitals for those who can’t pay their bills. The computer system will work for Tax ID number only, to eradicate those who don’t pay taxes/to clearly count taxpayers’ contributions, in order to address illegal immigration as a separate cost issue that amnesty would not rectify. Billing pages will say NO TAX ID NUMBER/employer address for those who are illegal or employer tax ID#.
The I.R.S. and government can’t oversee every minute financial transaction to ensure taxes are being properly reported and not misrepresented, but they can more fairly tax, properly appropriate, and identify fraud easier with improved and accurate TAX-ID data based info. That way, it would be easier to extend tax cuts or credits to those who have large medical bills, and give a stimulus check to those who stay in good health and aren’t abusing their body or the system.
Funding for the new I.R.S. data base Tax ID# health information will cost_________. All health care providers must participate or license to practice will be revoked. Records must be submitted when patient information is taken in for admission or appointment.
Those who receive Social Security checks or unemployment checks have the option to opt-in on their forms by asking for additional withholding. This bill extends coverage to those under-insured, most of the uninsured who receive government checks, and those who are unemployed will be added to their yearly federal income taxes/that will be offset when they become employed and file their W-4 over again.
This bill excludes illegal immigrants, for the National Health Insurance Plan, as they do not possess a TAX ID number unless they are claimed as a dependent under an optional employer withholding for workman’s compensation insurance only, once we can accurately assess medical costs by TAX ID #, then we can effectively determine the costs and amount of medical services used by illegals, as to levy a tax of 3%, or require an ID card where they must pay 10% sales tax. The I.R.S. and ICE will partner to manage those claims filed that have the listing as NO TAX ID NUMBER, and the I.R.S. will determine legal work status and recommend deportation if necessary. If an illegal needs care, they must put their employer’s TAX ID NUMBER on the claim, so that withholding can be investigated by the I.R.S., and if they do not work, the spouse or head of household must disclose the employer’s TAX ID#.
While this bill is just a simple readjustment of how we do things, it may be amended or modified to fit legislative language and action as appropriate.
If @BarackObama thinks he can bully the #Koch Brothers for private donations, imagine what he'll do to YOU w/ another 4 yr term.
Retweeted by Tea Party Chief
@BarackObama You have unleashed my fury hanging around and not vacating, if you thought 2010 was hard: wait and see what 8mos. will be like!
@BarackObama @RoyBlunt You tell Obama that I said GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE AND GET THE HELL OUT OF MY WALLET !!!!!!!!!!
@BarackObama @RoyBlunt Today I stand with Senator Blunt STOP#BULLYING PEOPLE OF FAITH AS AN IMPEACHED PRESIDENT#PayForYourOwnContraception
- reads like an itinerary for the next President, anyone could follow this and do a better job that what Obama did
- the suggestions and expounding are so good, that it is required reading for Tea Party folks
- well worth what you pay for it, I will be providing a cliff note version for Facebook group discussions and for group meetings, to circulate and reshare the information.
#2 DONALD TRUMP’S “TIME TO GET TOUGH”
- breaks down business, investing, and economics as related to leadership
- a little expensive, something that is a splurge purchase, but iconic and thorough, a tool worth having in your political tool box
- doesn’t really provide an action plan for Tea Party groups, but very well written
BOOKS THAT ARE ONLY PROPS FOR THE COFFEE TABLE: HERMAN CAIN’S BOOK IS HIS LIFE STORY, SARAH PALIN’S BOOK IS A MEMOIR, SO IS BACHMANN’S, AND WHILE THAT’S NICE I DIDN’T GLEAN ECONOMIC SOLUTIONS OR POLITICAL ONES!
DON’T WASTE YOUR MONEY....
“NO APOLOGY: THE CASE FOR AMERICAN GREATNESS”
ROMNEY’S BOOK IS REHASHED HISTORY WITH HIS OWN POLITICAL VIEWS INJECTED OVER IT, READS MORE LIKE AN LDS ADDITION... COULDN’T GET INTO IT, AND REALLY WASN’T SOLD ROMNEY UNDERSTOOD THE COMMON MAN OR THAT HIS SOLUTIONS WOULD WORK TO RESTORE THE ECONOMY, AS IT WAS MAINLY TIED TO HISTORY.
“END THE FED”
A CONSPIRATORIAL TAKE ON RON PAUL USING THE MAGIC ERASER AND GIVING SEVERAL CASES FOR ENDING THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN ITS ENTIRETY....
it is college level reading, and before giving you Book Review Part 2, let me say the holes that I identified with his philosophy and proposed solutions:
I disagree with Ron Paul... just because the policy was bad and debts were made with money that didn’t exist or wasn’t cut from other areas, doesn’t mean that ENDING THE FED and ripping up the notes solves the debt crisis:
1) This would tank the stock market on uncertainty and would end bond surety.
2) This would ruin our relationships with other countries and we would have to function without their trade.
3) This would put society back to a feudal system, rather than a federal system.
4) The damage from the debt would still exist with no way to repair the damage.
RON PAUL MISTAKENLY BLAMES THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT FOR EVERY CHAOTIC EVENT SINCE THE 1900’S !!!
BOOK REVIEW PART 2 WILL FOCUS MAINLY ON RICK PERRY’S BOOK CONTRASTED TO “END THE FED”...
NOTABLE DEATHS, CRIME, AND COMMUNITY CONCERNS:
| hide details 6:55 AM (15 hours ago) |
*
*Joe.Bergant@chardonschools.org
*"WSB-TV Talk2Us (CTV-Atlanta)" <talk2us@wsbtv.com>
*Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:55 AM
*Make adjustments as necessary:
*gmail.comMake adjustments as necessary:
While we are not totally sure of the motive for what happened at Chardon, we are certain that a program like this prevents school violence and serves as a mediator between students and faculty.
I was very shaken by hearing the date this occurred, as this was publicly released on 1/16/2012. As you know, our lives our now very connected by technology, and this was released on Twitter and Facebook.
My concern was that no one at Chardon reached out to T.J. Lane in a timely way, as indicated by his Facebook postings, that he was deeply troubled right after Christmas.
Even so, diffusing a conflict may not always resolve all issues, but the school then can say that they did all that they could do: I am unsure if T.J. Lane was dissatisfied to the school's response to his problems, or if his was a case of systemic abuse in the home that reached its breaking point. Regardless, this young man should have already been in family counseling and individual counseling. If he was not, I question the integrity of the court and community systems in place there.
Your football coach who fearlessly risked his own life for the student body is to be commended for his service and dedication to the students.
We are continuing in prayer for Ohio and your school, as we heard about this in Georgia about several hours after it happened. We called off the entire afternoon for prayer, just to recognize that children and young adults often feel that the entire world keeps going at a frenetic pace and no one is there for them when their world is falling apart around them.
May you find some peace and resoluteness this day, and may this assist you in going forward through grief and to restoration of your community.
-Ms. Aja Brooks
The Champion “Anti-bullying” Act of 2012: mandatory implementation of Peer Mediation Programs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12744tU65064xLEPL5YlHrqlnYyLocu6RJIsLupFupsc/edit?pli=1&hl=en_US
Any state who fails to implement a peer mediation program at their school may be held liable for negligence and be subject to loss of state/federal funding immediately, (especially those participating in federal education programs who may face disqualification over incidence(s) of violence at their school i.e., Race to the Top) effective 1/16/12: we do not need another federal law, or another state law, as something that requires years of passage to be recognized, implemented, and then finally upheld. It is crucial that we immediately reverse the trends that have occurred over the past fifteen years: citing Columbine, other mass school shootings, and schools that now operate as gang proving and training ground, instead of institutions of learning. In the 90’s, we saw these problems relegated to inner city schools: instead of addressing the problem by letting local authorities handle it, it began to fester. One need only recall the movies “Dangerous minds” in 1995 and “Light It Up”, 1999 films drawing attention to the systemic breakdown of the family as the governing unit of society, economic hardship, and the culture of innocence undone.
While the seeds were sown years ago for students, we need schools in the United States to recognize the current rapid deterioration in the sanctity of the classroom; classrooms that went from being dedicated to higher learning and being a haven of protection for our youth, that became a pass-thru gate to hell: a fast-track to the streets, guns, drugs, and violence. While we can not control the parents to whom a child is born any more than we can control how they are raised, a child in public school can be given the knowledge to overcome their past and meet a destiny of success, in overcoming life’s challenges and obstacles. Someone who would have little opportunity to educate themselves on their own, given their family’s means to educate their child being slim, may still be given the keys to unlock their future with a public education: to contribute to the good of society as a whole as an adult.
I can not praise our educators enough: those who paved the way before us, who taught us that we would be the movers and shakers of our generation, who would one day rise up to the occasion and put into practice what they taught us! For this very reason, we must remember what they taught us and teach it to the youth, not forgetting how we became the largest educated society in the modern world, being able to go to the college of our choice. We did not attain such enlightenment by means of oppression or in imitation of an existence that is only a pursuit of monetary or economic gain, but one of knowledge and character first. The integrity of the “Race to the Top Program” must be kept with an equal testing of academics which are to be met equally with character; not with cheating or the promotion of cheating, or we never learn anything except to cheat.
Governor Deal’s Proclamation provides issuance that the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is not only a recognized federal holiday, but in 2012, a state credo of conduct. With that in mind, it is with great regret that I draft this Act in Champion’s memory: while Champion was fatally beaten to death at FAMU, his home roots are here in GA as a former graduate of Southwest DeKalb. Southwest DeKalb has always been envied for putting on the best entertaining performances for a local marching band, from raucous park and blows to fly girl dancerettes. No one would have thought when I was in high school, as a 1998 Henry County Honor Graduate, that we would see Southwest DeKalb become a cesspool of gang activity. Even back then, it was understood that the best and brightest black students were in the band and that they were the best the community had to offer as the highest glory of youth, in that many joined the band to escape the streets and the county’s problems.
Something happened that changed the culture of the Southwest DeKalb band/FAMU: every band has little groups of friends and adolescent proving rituals, but most people in band in general do not go along with anything that involves physical harm or mimics the jock culture of football players and popular kids at school, with hazing in high school and rush in college. The Red Dawg Order is what changed Southwest DeKalb, turning bullies into murderers, and what made FAMU put the program over the lives of students: the use of codes of silence, gag orders, paid membership, beat-ins, and in Champion’s case, a fatal retaliation or retribution of some sort, ended a brilliant young man’s life. The Red Dawg Order is similar to what is known in the military as a CODE RED. Champion’s death was senseless and preventable, if only the Band Program’s Director had heeded another complaint made earlier in the week by a female student. With a peer mediation program, there is a paper trail: before a write-up is issued, formal punishment as decided by a Principal or College President, or before criminal charges are filed. All of which, disciplinary actions and legal imposition compound the bullying problems, increasing the retaliation, which makes it so a person who complains of abuse and speaks out about it, is doubly victimized... or it ends in their death, except when use of peer mediation is present. Conflict resolution is a means so that both sides are heard, thus preventing a verbal altercation, which usually leads to violent confrontation.
Teachers and Administration are to follow this policy in retrospect also: that if students dress like a gang, behave like a gang, and act as a gang, that these young people are engaging in adult base behaviors. Children are our greatest imitators, and they are only enacting and playing out scenarios from their homes and communities at school, some influenced by the media, some a terrible daily reality. The commitment to non-violence and conflict resolution is the solution to prevent it: needless deaths, beatings, and the manipulation tactics/exacting fear that bullies use to create the toxic environments our classrooms and extracurriculars have become.
Implementation of a peer mediation program is therefore; no longer an option, but a requirement by this Act. We can not have any more students die under the misconception that kids are being kids: yes words do hurt, and when feelings are dismissed/unresolved, those feelings become so powerful with children who do not know how to manage or resolve their anger that they become the sounds of preemptive breaking bones. Children are to be taught that engaging in fighting of any kind, can unintentionally lead to death; we can not take for granted their size or strength, nor that force exacted on another child, especially when force is taken for any other reason than to defend oneself. Students need to be taught that there is authority to be respected: officers and medical professionals who are trying to help them are not to be resisted, nor are parents or teachers intervening to prevent their harm or detriment. There are a lot of things that can happen in close hand-to-hand combat, and to raise a hand to anyone, the risk is that it could end in death.
With all that said, there are many free programs and materials available to school administration, wherein a teacher can issue a hall pass for peer mediation/to see the Principal, to schedule PEER MEDIATION as an alternative to writeups or ISS, and that way, students are encouraged to resolve their problems. We are teaching them to do so in the way adults do resolve problems and should resolve them, as a matter of practice and principle. It is not enough to preach morality of habits and good character, if we do not give the tool of peer mediation to use it to uphold the standard of non-violence and healthy conflict resolution.
Peer mediation is hopefully the first and last step that needs to be taken to end bullying. However, in the instance of Champion’s case resulting in death, it may be necessary to disband the organization entirely and eradicating anything that resembles it. Firing the teacher or director does not always resolve the issues between students: dismantling the group, ending the program, or destroying the culture of bullying, like changing the uniforms/having new members or new membership requirements a year after the conflict, usually curtails any violence with the consequences spelled out from the beginning. Let us all do our part in our classrooms and communities to end bullying before it becomes bullying.
See resources: http://www.studygs.net/shared/disclaimer.htm
Any program that meets this standards is acceptable: http://www.studygs.net/peermed.htm
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @FOX5Atlanta You reach accountability at 10, knowing right from wrong, puberty anywhere from 8-13 or so, he should be tried as adult #TJLane
FoxNews.com Live @FoxNewsLiveLive: Passing of Andrew #Breitbart at live.foxnews.com. Plus: Should the federal government be able to mandate contraceptive coverage?
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty 10:14 AM - 1 Mar 12 via web · Details
JOURNALISTS WHO POURED THEIR LIVES INTO THEIR WORK, WHO DIED WHILE WORKING, GIVE US CAUSE TO REMEMBER THEM AND THE POWER OF A FREE PRESS TO CHANGE OUR WORLD FOR THE BETTER, AND HOW OUR LIVES WERE MADE BETTER BY THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN REPORTING:
Conservative activist Andrew Breitbart dead at 43
| Recommend | 314 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. |
Conservative journalist Andrew Breitbart speaks at a news conference prior to U.S. Congressman Anthony Weiner (D-NY) in New York, June 6, 2011.
Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid
By Alex Dobuzinskis
LOS ANGELES | Thu Mar 1, 2012 7:45pm EST
(Reuters) - Conservative activist Andrew Breitbart, an influential voice in Republican circles known for his online media attacks on liberals, died unexpectedly of natural causes in Los Angeles early on Thursday, his family said. He was 43.
Breitbart, the founder of a news website named after himself, was walking late on Wednesday near his Los Angeles home when he collapsed, said his father-in-law, actor Orson Bean.
"He collapsed on the sidewalk and the paramedics were there very quickly and they couldn't revive him," Bean told Reuters in a phone interview.
A friend of Breitbart told Reuters he had a history of heart problems and is believed to have suffered a heart attack.
The brash and outspoken blogger and commentator, who published politically inspired photos and undercover videos and aimed much of his ire at Hollywood liberals, was at the center of several news websites including www.Breitbart.tv, www.breitbart.com and www.biggovernment.com.
Breitbart relished the role he cast for himself as an embattled conservative on the margins of the mainstream media he called "the Complex." Even so, he gained fans as a frequent guest on television news shows.
His work helped generate a number of prominent news stories. Those included undercover videos posted on his website about ACORN, a grass-roots group that offered housing assistance and other aid to the poor, and his role in bringing to national attention a sexually suggestive photo Democratic U.S. Representative Anthony Weiner of New York posted through his Twitter page.
That scandal eventually led to Weiner's resignation last year.
BROUGHT DOWN ACORN
In targeting ACORN, or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Breitbart posted videos in 2009 by conservative activists who secretly taped employees of the group giving tax advice to a couple posing as a pimp and a prostitute.
The controversy led Congress to deny federal housing funds to ACORN, which disbanded in 2010.
Bertha Lewis, the former head of ACORN, told Reuters she was sad to hear about Breitbart's death. But she said the videos Breitbart posted about ACORN, which helped launch his website in 2009, were selectively edited.
"He really did a lot of damage to a 40-year-old organization that helped millions of low and moderate income folks," Lewis said.
Breitbart faced widespread criticism when in 2010 his website posted a heavily edited version of a speech by U.S. Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod that led to her forced resignation.
Sherrod, who is black, said her bosses at USDA pushed her to resign after Breitbart posted portions of a video in which she seemed to say she had discriminated against a white farmer. But in the full video of the speech that Sherrod gave, she had in fact said race should not matter.
Breitbart mentioned the Sherrod controversy last night in one of his last Twitter messages, in response to a back-and-forth discussion with Web users in which one person suggested he should apologize to Sherrod. "Apologize for WHAT?" Breitbart wrote back.
Breitbart cut his teeth in the freewheeling world of online media as an editor of the Drudge Report, working in Los Angeles. He also worked with liberal blogger Arianna Huffington, playing an early role in the creation of the Huffington Post, which was founded in 2005.
Matt Drudge, founder of the Drudge Report, said in a message on his website on Thursday that he remembered Breitbart as "a constant source of energy, passion and commitment."
"I still see him in my mind's eye in Venice Beach (in Los Angeles), the sunny day I met him. He was in his mid 20s. It was all there. He had a wonderful, loving family and we all feel great sadness for them today," Drudge wrote.
Mickey Kaus, a liberal writer who blogs at website The Daily Caller, said Breitbart and Huffington managed to collaborate despite their political differences.
"Arianna is a tolerant person and he had a personal bond with her so he could forge an alliance with her, he could forge an alliance with me because I'm a Democrat who likes to trash Democrats," Kaus said.
"He was more against the cultural left than against the policy left," Kaus added.
Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney said on his Twitter page that he and his wife were "deeply saddened" by Breitbart's death, calling him a "brilliant entrepreneur, fearless conservative, loving husband and father."
Breitbart was transported to a hospital where he was pronounced dead at 12:19 a.m. on Thursday, said Ed Winter, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Department of Coroner. An autopsy is tentatively scheduled for Friday.
Breitbart was memorialized in a page at Breitbart.tv.
"We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior. Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love," the memorial page said.
The message said Breitbart "passed away unexpectedly from natural causes."
It was unclear what would become of the editorial team Breitbart created and ran from his headquarters in Los Angeles.
"He was such a larger-than-life person with so much energy and spirit and could do things 24 hours a day, I just don't see how you can replace him," Kaus said.
Breitbart is survived by his wife, Susannah, and their four children.
(Additional reporting by Susan Heavey, Tim Gaynor and Mark Hosenball, Editing by Xavier Briand)
*
*Marie Colvin 'was buried in Homs'
(UKPA) – 5 hours ago
A video posted online by Syrian activists shows what it says is the burial of Sunday Times journalist Marie Colvin, who was killed last week in a rocket attack in the central city of Homs.
In the video, posted on YouTube, a man says he is in a cemetery in the neighbourhood of Baba Amr, where Colvin was killed.
The man, who is unidentified but frequently appears in videos from the neighbourhood, says activists decided to bury her because they did not have electricity to keep her body refrigerated and that it had started to decay.
Ms Colvin was killed on February 22 in an attack that also killed French photographer Remi Ochlik.
The video, whose content could not be independently verified, does not mention Mr Ochlik's body.
Meanwhile, French president Nicolas Sarkozy said journalists Edith Bouvier and William Daniels, who were trapped in Syria, have made it safely into Lebanon.
Ms Bouvier and Mr Daniels had been trapped in the Baba Amr district of Homs during a month-long siege.
Mr Sarkozy made the announcement during a summit in Brussels.
Earlier, Syrian rebels made what they called a "tactical retreat" from the district, saying they were running low on weapons and the humanitarian conditions were unbearable.
Ms Bouvier was wounded last week in the government rocket attack on a makeshift media centre that killed Ms Colvin and Mr Ochlik.
Copyright © 2012 The Press Association. All rights reserved.
2 foreign journalists buried in Syria and 2 flee to Lebanon after ordeal in shelled city
REMI OCHLIK-PHOTOGRAPHER( Rodrigo Abd / Associated Press ) - Free Syrian Army supporters chant anti government slogans under snowfall on the outskirts of Idlib , north Syria, Wednesday, Feb. 29, 2012.
By Associated Press, Updated: Thursday, March 1, 6:33 PM
BEIRUT — Two Western journalists killed in the Syrian city of Homs last week were buried in the embattled neighborhood where they died, according to activist videos posted Thursday, while two other reporters escaped into neighboring Lebanon.The videos and escape were steps toward the end of the ordeal of six Western journalists who sneaked into Syria illegally to report on the uprising against President Bashar Assad and found themselves trapped inside the besieged Homs neighborhood of Baba Amr.
Complicating the picture, the Syrian government said late Thursday it had found the bodies of three Western journalists — including that of one who entered Lebanon Wednesday — and would return them to their countries.
A government rocket attack last week on a makeshift media center they were sharing with Syrian activists killed two of the journalists and wounded two others, drawing attention to their presence in one of the most dangerous places in a country on the verge of civil war. It also led to intense work by diplomats, activists and the Red Cross to try to get them out.
American reporter Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik were killed in the Feb. 22 attack that also wounded French reporter Edith Bouvier and British photographer Paul Conroy. Also stuck in the rebel-held neighborhood, which has been under a tight government siege and daily shelling for nearly four weeks, were Javier Espinosa of Spain and William Daniels of France.
Late Thursday, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Bouvier and Daniels had been successfully smuggled across the border into Lebanon. Conroy and Espinosa were both smuggled into Lebanon this week in an operation that activists said killed 13 people.
“I had (Bouvier) on the phone. She is with her colleague, outside Syria,” Sarkozy said during an impromptu news briefing in Brussels. “She has suffered a lot, but she will give the details herself.”
Also Thursday, activists posted videos online showing the burials of Colvin and Ochlik.
In the videos, a man who says he is Dr. Mohammed Ahmed al-Mohammed and who frequently appears in videos from the neighborhood, says activists decided to bury the two on Feb. 27 because the neighborhood lacked electricity to keep the bodies refrigerated. They had started to decay, he says.
Al-Mohammed praises the work of the journalists, who sneaked into Syria to report on the 11-month-old uprising that the U.N. says has left more than 7,500 people dead. Activists put the number at more than 8,000.
The Syrian government has prevented most reporters from working in the country.
“Marie Colvin was martyred in Baba Amr because she was sending a heavenly message, a humanitarian message,” al-Mohammed says in one video, appearing to be on the verge of tears. “She was telling the truth about what is happening in Baba Amr. May God be merciful to you, Marie, as we bury you in this garden.”
In the other, he says Ochlik was “doing his humanitarian duty, and doing his duty as completely as possible to send the true picture of what is going on in Baba Amr during the most terrible time.”
In Colvin’s video, the camera shows a body wrapped in white cloth at al-Mohammed’s feet with a white paper attached to it reading “Marie Colvin” in English. He opens the fabric to reveal the badly burned face of a white person. It cannot be recognized as Colvin, a longtime war correspondent for Britain’s Sunday Times.
Al-Mohammed also struck out at the U.S. and Europe for not intervening to stop the shelling in Homs, even accusing the U.S. administration of “collaborating” with Assad’s regime.
“Does it make sense that America in all its greatness could not stop Assad from launching rockets at Baba Amr and could not remove Bashar from his seat?” he says.
The U.S., Europe and Arab countries have condemned Assad crackdown on opposition, but have said they will not intervene militarily.
“May God be merciful to her,” the man says as dirt falls on Colvin’s body. “Only God can help us.”
He does the same in Ochlik’s video, revealing a face that looks like Ochlik’s with red wounds around the mouth and nose.
“He will remain eternally in our minds because he sent the true voice, the true picture and the true reality of what is happening here,” al-Mohammed says.
The Baba Amr section of Homs has been the target of the heaviest Syrian military shelling during a four-week siege of rebel-held parts of Homs. Rebel forces said Thursday they were pulling out of the neighborhood, and a Syrian government official said the army had moved in. Activists say hundreds have been killed in Homs.
The Syrian state news agency reported late Thursday that specialists from the Syrian government had found the bodies of three foreign journalists. It said they had been disinterred and would be transferred to Damascus so they could be identified and returned to their countries.
The report said the bodies were of Colvin, Ochlik and Espinosa. Syrian government officials could not be reached for further comment. Espinosa’s domestic partner and his employer, El Mundo, said he is in Lebanon.
Reached at her home in East Norwich, N.Y., Colvin’s mother, Rosemarie, said the family had received conflicting reports about her daughter’s body.
“We’re not getting any kind of decent information. It’s all contradictory,” she said. It was unclear if she had seen the video.
French leaders celebrated the escape of Bouvier, of Le Figaro, and Daniels.
Sarkozy said they were in Lebanon on their way to Beirut.
Foreign Minister Alain Juppe expressed his “immense joy” that the two were safe in Lebanon.
“They were taken in by the French Embassy in Beirut and everything is being done to ensure their medical care and their repatriation as soon as possible,” he said.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
AFTER FOLLOWING THE NEUMAN TRIAL FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS, I AM NOT SWAYED BY EVIDENCE THAT SNEIDERMAN’S CHILDREN WERE ENDANGERED BY RUSTY, NOR AM I CONVINCED THAT HE WAS INSANE AT THE TIME OF THE MURDER...
Insanity is a legal definition, not a medical diagnoses: read both Psychosis en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosis and Insanityen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity
A female cardinal tried to fly into my window just now, it is a message...
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @wsbtv very interesting that she has done 12 evaluations for accused murderers
@wsbtv right before the trial began, a cardinal appeared in my window associated with the number 12, witness testifies she'd done this 12x
13h
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @wsbtv it also bothers me that she was called as a witness with a lobbying interest in the matter
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty @wsbtv it also bothers me that she was called as a witness with a lobbying interest in the matter
@wsbtv watching on 11.2 -- this lady presents herself as an authority but she comes across very egotistical and it's about her, her, her lol
The day care murder trial is streaming now on WSBTV.com. A forensic psychologist is on the stand first thing wsbtv.com/s/news/live/
Retweeted by Tea Party Chief
LIVE TWEETS FROM WATCHING THE NEUMAN TRIAL: Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv A person who is insane does not reason or justify their behavior: therefore, I do not believe Neuman was insane demon-possessed maybe
9m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Neuman was not defending himself; he sought out Rusty to kill him and he confronted him in such a manner to destroy Rusty.
10m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv With that said, it is crucial to understand that you have a right to defend your well being, if someone attempts to destroy you.
10m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Meaning that one respects another person's life, because God created that person-just as one was created by God-to take life is wrong
13m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv A person who honors God believes God's laws supersede man's laws, and respect for life is essential tenet to interpretation of laws.
14m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv legal laws are not the same as God's laws and when they lack the spirit of the law, they are abusive, not respective to society
15m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv A person who can not honor legal laws must be confined, and someone who executes and murders, not defending oneself must be put down!
16m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Neuman broke spiritual law/covenant with God first, then moral/legal laws on separation and divorce, then broke the law in murdering.
18m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Neuman omitted honoring God, he committed adultery, he then broke legal law in killing a man as not designated by the state to do so.
19m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv meaning Neuman rationalized his behavior against God's will, against marital law, and then criminal law in taking Rusty's life.
22m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv by doing things that we must not do. So the way in which a person sins is broad: Neuman lost his constitutional thinking....
24m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv gave birth to death, in what Neuman must not do: when he killed Rusty. So we sin by failing to do right, not doing right, and
25m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv In other words there are sins of omission and commission: Neuman omitted honoring God first, committed adultery, but sin full grown
28m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv I'm not saying sin isn't sin, but it certainly wasn't beneficial for Neuman to persist with Andrea, for his own sake:
33m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv someone who is bipolar knows they don't feel right, feels overtaken by emotion/compelled to act against their will, and feels remorse
34m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv someone who snaps does not think that far into what they are doing, it evolved past a psychotic episode to full grown criminal action
35m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Neuman fully intended to kill Rusty to relieve Andrea, which he did, then crafted his plea to remain alive so they could be together
36m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Someone who snaps or blacks out, doesn't go through all that trouble nor do they have a grand scheme like Neuman had to bag Andrea.
36m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv He is guilty of murder, because he premeditated and searched, plotted, schemed, disguised, and carried through to completion.
37m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv Neuman crossed a point where his intentions, behaviors, and actions crossed the line from being unhealthy to criminal...
38m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv You can have a bipolar mood swing or episode without violence, in knowing you aren't right, clear thinking, or balanced.
39m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv while Neuman's desires and choices were certainly unhealthy and sinful, at first his motives were not corrupted murderous intentions
45m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv I understand-counselors typify his desires for 'Mrs.' Sneiderman #delusional but not if she slept with him/needed to repent statement
47m Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv In watching Neuman trial, I am not convinced that Neuman was insane: 1) he lacked medical symptoms 2) counselors did not hospitalize
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv very interesting that she has done 12 evaluations for accused murderers
1h Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv right before the trial began, a cardinal appeared in my window associated with the number 12, witness testifies she'd done this 12x
1h Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv it also bothers me that she was called as a witness with a lobbying interest in the matter
1h Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
@wsbtv watching on 11.2 -- this lady presents herself as an authority but she comes across very egotistical and it's about her, her, her lol
In reply to WSB-TV
1h WSB-TV @wsbtv Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open
The day care murder trial is streaming now on WSBTV.com. A forensic psychologist is on the stand first thing wsbtv.com/s/news/live/
Retweeted by Tea Party Chief
Tea Party Chief @2012_TeaParty Reply Delete Favorite · Open
Insanity is a legal definition, not a medical diagnoses: read both Psychosis en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosis and Insanity en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity
Watch Channel 2 Action News Live | Day Care Murder Trial
wsbtv.com
hemy neuman trial live, dunwoody day care murder live
Standoff ends with man being fatally shot for firing on CCPD and SWAT Officers http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/police-surround-home-after-chase-carjacking/nK8L5/
Police surround home after chase, carjacking
www.wsbtv.com
Clayton County authorities have surrounded a home in search of a carjacking suspect. Authorities said the standoff stemmed from a carjacking at a home on Flint River Road on Wednesday afternoon.
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOUND TO OBAMA ECONOMIC PROBLEMS...
TO READ THE FULL BLOG, GO HERE...
No comments:
Post a Comment